Librarium Online - View Single Post

Phalanx · April 11th, 2008, 20:00

I've never liked retconning. I like it when the story is continued on, but retconning annoys me- its like a really bad cop-out. Also, I don't recall the Greek gods being that nice to eachother and subortinating some of their followers to the sevants of another god (or if they did, they probably had a champion of their own in attendance).

Even a rule like "you much have a hero of a god/undivided in order to take god specific units" would be better. Ex: if your general was undivided, no restrictions. Otherwise, you, for example, would need a GD or tzeentch or a herald of tzeentch in order to take horros/screamers/flamers/etc. Makes sense, right?

Does anyone remember if having a mark does anything other than let you get greater daemon gifts?

April 11th, 2008, 20:00	#94 (permalink)
Phalanx Tyranid Warrior Fanatic Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Canada Age: 22 Posts: 2,502 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Rep Power: 73	I've never liked retconning. I like it when the story is continued on, but retconning annoys me- its like a really bad cop-out. Also, I don't recall the Greek gods being that nice to eachother and subortinating some of their followers to the sevants of another god (or if they did, they probably had a champion of their own in attendance). Even a rule like "you much have a hero of a god/undivided in order to take god specific units" would be better. Ex: if your general was undivided, no restrictions. Otherwise, you, for example, would need a GD or tzeentch or a herald of tzeentch in order to take horros/screamers/flamers/etc. Makes sense, right? Does anyone remember if having a mark does anything other than let you get greater daemon gifts? __________________ Through Fang and Claw - Space Wolves and Tyranids Player Last edited by Phalanx; April 11th, 2008 at 20:02.