Thread: Defining Cheesy
View Single Post
Old April 26th, 2008, 16:57   #6 (permalink)
2000AD
Senior Member
 
2000AD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Leeds
Age: 25
Posts: 445
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 35
2000AD has got six and seven beckons...2000AD has got six and seven beckons...2000AD has got six and seven beckons...2000AD has got six and seven beckons...2000AD has got six and seven beckons...2000AD has got six and seven beckons...
Default

The following post is inspired heavily by one of the most quoted proponents of competative gaming, Dave Sirlin (Link to his website)
-------

There'll allways be people whose aim is to win and at the opposite end of the scale are the people who just play for the sake of the hobby. Most of the time they're happy playing no matter what. The people playing for the sake of playing just enjoy the experience, while the players playing to win take joy from either winning, a hard fought equal game or a valuable learning experience showing what they need to improve.

The annoying players are those that lie around the half way mark that want to win, but will call any tactic they don't like 'cheap', 'cheasy', 'beardy' or whatever word they want to use. They'll moan and whine about how they only lost because the opponent was cheap and how they didn't play to the spirit of their army, but what they can't accept is that, more often than not, the player that plays to win is often the better player.

Warhammer is a game. It knows no defination of fair or unfair, cheesy or uncheesy, beyond the one simple black or white boundary:
Obeying the rules or breaking the Rules.
As long as the rules are obeyed then anything goes. The person playing to win will use any means necessary as long as it falls within the rules of the game. The person who cries cheesy builds his own set of rules on top of that and limits what he can do.

Chances are a few months later a tactic that was once called cheesy will be easy to beat, but the player who declared it cheesy will still lose to it because rather than try and think of a way to counter it he just called it 'cheap' and tried to take some percieved morale high ground. Meanwhile the players playing to win have probably found more strategies that take the game to a higher level, beyond the old tactic, and which will no doubt still elicit calls of 'cheesy' from the so called 'non-beardy' players.

One group of players are constantly learning and improving, another is stagnent and makes excuses for why it loses.
Which are really the better players?


If you want to play just to have fun then you're going to have to do one of 2 things:
- Find other people like yourself and play them.
Or
- Accept that if you play someone who plays to win then you'll probably lose. Don't whine about beardyness, just try and have fun, even if you're getting massacred.
__________________
2000AD's answer to all "How do VC deal with ..." questions: Forbidden Lore + 2 Power Stones.
Further answers will require more vodka.
2000AD is offline