View Single Post
Old December 31st, 2008, 02:45   #5 (permalink)
ArchonFarseerGuy
Om nom nom
 
ArchonFarseerGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Where you least expect me, brandishing a hungry Banhammer...
Age: 18
Posts: 4,098
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 96
ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?ArchonFarseerGuy Who sits atop the mountain?
Annual LO Award 
Total Awards: 1
Default

I'm leaving the bandwagon, and casting my lot with Bretts. Here's why:
*The knights have a huge advantage in mobility. This advantage means two things:
-There can feasibly be two units of knights engaging the Empire's front. This was one of my biggest concerns about 7th Ed.
-There will only be one round of shooting, before everything is smooshed under the weight of tempered metal and wooden sticks into a barely identifiable blob of red.

*The lack of cc Detachments means the knights will hit home in a VERY nasty charge. The way the Empire can win combats is through static CRes, which said Detachments provide.

*The Crossbowmen shouldn't be a problem. Pretty much everything in the army will be reduced to a 3+ save. If they were handguns, I'd consider differently.

*Both the Trebuchets can make mincemeat of the Empire Knights, wounding on a 2+, and ignoring armour.

All the Empire really have gunning for them are a few Cannons which will be silenced, and R&F, which should be overwhelmed by the Brett charge. And when it does happen, the banners will pick up huge VPs.
ArchonFarseerGuy is offline