Tailor Made Or Custom Played? - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Over the years I've heard a number of people complain that "tailoring" your army to fight a specific enemy is not good sporstmanship (gamesmanship, perhaps?). Many of these people would like a more rigid system where there is a limit on how much of a specific weapon/unit/power you can use in specific point game. For example (and I use Eldar examples because they are accused of this often) using 3 Wraithlords or 3 squads of Dark Reapers is unfair (especially 1000 pt. or less games).

    These people claim that when you over use an asset that your army has it becomes "cheese". If I load my Eldar army up with Starcannons to combat Marines or if I switch them for Scatter Lasers against Orks I am a power gamer. I understand that it's much harder for some armies to tailor a squad to combat specific threats (a basic Ork squad can only have Big Shoota's, Burna's and Rokkit's) and some newer players just do not have enough models to do this regardless of what army they play.

    Personally I believe that this a freedom that the game allows you and there is no such thing is "cheese" (every army will have a weakness), but should there at least be guidelines on how to put together an army? Anyone been accused of this or had any experiances like this?


  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    556
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    2 (x2)

    its common sense though, you might load up on lascannons for necrons, but switch all those choices to autocannons or heavy bolters for IG, its not like you should have to choose and get your ass kicked in the game every time you play an army that can defeat you with the setup you have
    <img src='http://www.directdesign.ru/portfolio/poster/img/10.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

  4. #3
    Member Fallen Angel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Nowhere
    Age
    26
    Posts
    238
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    2 (x1)

    Its perfectly reasonable to tailor armies to fight certain opponents, the exception to this rule is tournaments though, as you have to be fair on everyone.

    For example, I regularily play against guard and tau so my army contains lots of plasma cannons and autocannons and the like, but occasionaly I face a space-marine army, In which case I switch over to missile-launchers and lascannons
    What doesn't kill you, cripples you for life

    Whoever invented the Rubix Cube had a sick and twisted sense of humor

    I will not eat oysters, i want my food dead, not sick, not wounded, dead.

  5. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Its gennerally fine.
    If your forces knew they were coming up against an armoured company do you think theyd load up on heavy bolters?
    no, theyd load up on lascannons, missile launchers and meltaguns.
    If they knew they were coming up against marines they shouldnt take only starcannons for theyre heavy weapons.
    Specifying against an opent is ok, as long as its no just a ione gun victory.
    yes i am saying something about all starcannon eldar armies.....i think....am i...... :huh:
    ARGH&#33; Run away&#33;
    Wait, we have to take a mo
    Damn that *runs off*
    Oh look i passed, guess im staying here in front of that giant bloodthirster.

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    397
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    We usually stick to one army list like a tournament around here. Some games get tailored, but not too many.

  7. #6
    A very violent persona Apotheosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    City of Angels
    Posts
    1,875
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    13 (x4)

    in tournys, you can&#39;t change the lists. but when just playing for fun, i change them all the time. Yeah, like i&#39;m gonna use the EXACT same lists that i use for crons when i play Eldar.
    "And whoever wants to be a creator in good and evil, must first be an annihilator and break values. Thus the highest evil belongs to the greatest goodness: but this is--being creative."

    ~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~

  8. #7
    Senior Member HyperX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    337
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputation
    35 (x1)

    This issue comes up alot recently... and like Wadayamean said:
    If your forces knew they were coming up against an armoured company do you think theyd load up on heavy bolters?no, theyd load up on lascannons, missile launchers and meltaguns.
    It makes sence but none the less it is annoying. The way we play tourneys is practical and works great:

    1) All players give a Army list to the tourney ref. This list contains the player&#39;s name the race he uses and the (usualy) 1000 pts army

    2) then they give the reinforcment army list: this list consists of extra units that can be swaped in between games but this list can hold no more than 10 individual figures or a max of 25% of the total pts game size
    (The figures are counted at their highest cost possible in the codex. For example, Dark angels can use plasma cannons in thier tactical squads @ 30 pts a peice but in a devestator squad they are worth 15 + 35 = 50. So we count them as 50 pts and so on).

    In other words if you play a game of 1000 pts then:
    the primary army list = 1000pts
    the reinforcment army list = 10 figures or 250pts

    This represents the fact that a Army wont always have everything it wants in unlimited amounts... anyhow it makes it really fun and pretty equal for everyone. beacause if someone has an army thats strong against something the opponent might have something that will turn the tides

    HyperX
    I had this long signature made up, but I didnt like it...

  9. #8
    Lasgun Cell Cook BoxANT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,096
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    118 (x6)

    i heard that some tournments ask you to bring 3 lists. one is 1000points and you have to use that every game. the other two are both 500points and you can choose which one you use before each game. i think its a good idea. however i also like the idea of making one versitile list for a tourny and just sticking to it... but sometimes you just get owned bad :lol:

  10. #9
    Son of LO H0urg1ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    171 (x6)

    I never change my list just because I&#39;m facing a new opponenet. My strategy is to write a list that can already take on any army that I might face. I don&#39;t too bad using this idea either. My White Scars list hasn&#39;t changed since I first wrote it and my record with them at my store is 27/5/6.

    The key to 40k is writing a balanced list and also having a good sense of tactics to make the full use of your list. I&#39;ve had people put in every high ST weapon allowed in their army just to take out my TO 5 bikes, but due to a lack of decent tactics he still lost badly.

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Well, I tend to play a "theme" (currently Colonial Marines because a friend of mine is building a &#39;nids army. I&#39;m sure something else will catch my fancy in a week or so though ), so I use the same list for most every battle. It is tough to do that with Guard, and I have to say I don&#39;t win many battles, but I like the feel of my army enough not to really care. The failure of my guys to win makes it that much more tragic-heroic, I guess. (About the only level of heroism I can aspire to with my skills .)

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts