Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
Ok, it was dont, but it got locked a while ago, so Im starting it up again...:rolleyes:to whoever said that, Sigsmund is SO not a Primarch1. Night Haunter
2. Angron (pre-heresy)
4. Sanguinius and Sigismund
5. Magnus the Red (would be higher if he were prettier )
As for me, Best is Magnus. Worst is Leman Russ(I know, steriotypical thousand som )
"Vengance for the ultamate betrayal....Vengance for a fathers betrayal of his son. FOR THE NIGHT HAUNTER!!!"
This thread will probably be locked, too. Really: do not make a new thread when a previous one with the same topic has been locked. It was locked for a reason. If you disagree with that reason, take it up with the moderator who locked it or a supervisor.
Why do the survivors remain anonymous -- as if cursed -- while the dead are revered? Why do we cling to what we lose while we ignore what we still hold?
Name none of the fallen, for they stood in our place, and stand there still in each moment of our lives.
--Duiker, "Deadhouse Gates"
Okay, before Lord of Change locks this again, I'll try and get a point across.
We at this forum have rules both against reviving standard topics that have discussed myriad times before and topics that inherently contain the potential to start an argument. This includes any "what's the best/worst [insert noun here]" topics. Topics such as "what's the best army" or "what's the best Marine chapter" have, in our experience, started off fairly well and nearly always degenerated into random arguments and flame wars that go around and around in circles for eternity until a prudent mod decides enough is enough.
So, creating a topic titled "Best and Worst Primarch" is, inevitably, going to include one person saying "Well, I think Lion El'Jonson was the best for blah blah blah" and another poster replying by saying "That's not write, Leman Russ is easily the best because blah blah blah" and a third poster coming in and calling the first two idiots and listing his numerous and comprehensive reasons why Sanguinius is t3h pwnage, yes he is. Pretty soon it gets ugly. It's why topics like this should be carefully worded to avoid that kind of eventuation. In any case, these kind of opinionated arguments very rarely do anything productive or pleasant and instead just create a nasty forum debate that is disruptive to all concerned.
That said, this is indeed an overdone and rather stale topic that pops up every few months, and many of the senior members would appreciate never seeing it again. If you wish to learn other member's views on the subject, please peruse the forum's history via the search feature rather than beginning a new topic. If you read them, it may give you an idea of why we try to avoid them. I myself was caught up in a similar argument birthed from a similar topic a year and a half ago that got me and another member both temp-banned and a severe reprimand from the reigning mod at the time. Also, if you have a dispute towards a topic being locked, please go to your User CP and PM the mod responsible for an explanation. If you give a good enough reason why it shouldn't be locked, I'm sure he or she will agree to open it again. Simply cloning the topic is a surefire way to get it locked straight away and then get yelled at.
Now that this is out of the way, I'll give you a day or so to PM me or LoC to justify keeping this thread open, and then one of us will lock it.
Have a nice day
Last edited by ze_poodle; May 1st, 2006 at 07:39.
The above poster = Totally a member of the Fluff Masters Clan. Click here for fluff pwnage.
Come, sons of LO! Kneel before Poodle!
Mr_Wayne: "Some people believe that the World Eaters do not field any ranged weaponry. Those people often die at a distance."
Magnus the Red, both Ostsol and Ze_Poodle are correct. Please read their posts and keep in mind their points. Also, for formâ€™s sake, since you obviously havenâ€™t familiarised yourself with the forum rules, which are mandatory reading for new members, I will quote to you from them:
â€?After repeated complaints about polls taking up too much space on the forum and encouraging spamming, it has been decided that polls should be kept to a minimum. Polls include (but are not limited to) all threads starting with the following sentences: â€˜Which is your favouriteâ€¦â€™, â€˜Who would you beâ€¦â€™, and â€˜What is the bestâ€¦â€™, as well as any variations hereof. Such threads add nothing useful to the forum, promote no intellectual advancement or sharing of useful information, and most members actually find them fairly annoying. So please keep the number down, thank you.â€?
Furthermore, the rules also state that â€œâ€¦any decision made by the Admins or Mods is final.â€? Lordofchange already locked one post of yours that was nearly identical to this one. Please donâ€™t try to circumvent the decisions of the moderators by simply creating a new thread with a very similar content.
The forum rules can be found here: Forum rules. Please read them. Thank you.
"Girls are nice and cuddly on the outside, and freaky on the inside." ~ Lost Nemesis.