Medusa V problems - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Son of LO LordLink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australian. Capital. Territory
    Age
    26
    Posts
    3,475
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    228 (x8)

    Medusa V problems

    Well at the beginning of Medusa V I had firm belief that just maybe GW would let people play and not rig the campaign.

    SMurfs and Guard 1st and second: just how GW wants it as it will help their advertising.

    Eldar 3rd: GW needed eldar to come about 3rd or else they would have to change the new codex to include a polluted webway, something they dont want to do.

    Tyranids are 4th: since the tyranids didn't have that serious an objective they were the ideal bad guys to come next.

    Chaos 5th: since they are behind the imperium and eldar its all irrelevant where chaos come they are doomed, just put them in a good position so that the other bad guys are forced below them.

    Dark Eldar, orks, necrons 6th: Lets put in the unlikely event of a three-way draw so that we can just collectively say "the bad guys lost".

    Tau in last place: Tau had to be in last place for GW to remain breathing. After a new codex just released GW would have been horrified at having to introduce psykers to the race.

    I know a lot of people will disagree with me but I think its curious how eldar were dominating Medusa V and suddenly they get 2 last places in a row. Putting them just behind the precious Imperium.

    Its not the most convincing argument but the results turned out EXACTLY like GW wanted them and after eye of terror GW have a history of cheating.

    Check out my Codex: Farmyard Animals here!

    If anyone wants any kind of help writing fluff for any kind of GW army just ask.

    Fluffmaster
    Anzac Clan

  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member Zero Blizzard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    It's a nut, with a small mountain.
    Posts
    253
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    7 (x1)

    Well, I am under the assumption that GW hasn't rigged the campaign, and as far as I know, it all turned out for the better.
    If terrorists ask you "Do you have a bullet through your head?" say proudly, with dignity, "No, I do not. Go fish."

    Catalysts of Iron/Iron Warriors 0/0/0

    Soldiers of the Forge Worlds Clan Founder.

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Whitby Ontario
    Age
    29
    Posts
    535
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    21 (x0)

    I agree with LordLink. GW rigged the hell out of this campaign......Besides even if they didnt It would have been similar anyway......to many marine players.......

    Also I never got mentioned in the weekly reports execpt to get critized on being unorky....Dispite being the highest ranked Ork and 4th highest ranked player in Canada! All cause I have my Warboss name is Queen Cuddlepuff Happysquig the Good Intentioned of Da Pretty Boys....my Ork army is a queer as me.....stupid GW....

  5. #4
    Normal member Fox D: Toastee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
    Age
    32
    Posts
    3,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    254 (x8)

    Well the results don't come out till the 6th September. Last I checked two hours before the end, Tau were 7th.

    I'd be more inclined to wait for those results before thinking that GW may or may not have rigged it.

    *Moved to 40k Campaigns*
    Want to chat? You can normally find me in the LO CHAT!
    LO CHAT! JOIN US NOW AND BECOME A GOD OF BACON.

  6. #5
    Benevolent Dictator CaptainSarathai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    inside your head
    Posts
    9,221
    Mentioned
    77 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    1480 (x8)

    Personally, I'd bet my nuts on the fact that GW already has their history set-up for them, and they won't let anyone change it. Essentially, you need to turn a blind eye to the results, and just read everything leading up to it. In the very end, certain armies are going to get whacked and finish last. However, if said armies can stay in 2nd/3rd place until they post the results, then you know and I know that you came in 2nd or 3rd place.
    Look at any of the other campaigns, ie EOT, and then the codexes that came after it. The Cadians came out on top even though they really sucked in the campaign. Or at least until GW put their finger in the pies and 'fixed' the rankings.

    Ps. I'm betting cashews you sickos:w00t:
    Pts Values for AoS here!

    Nippon Armybook: Isuu, Scribd, and free at Google Docs

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    835
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputation
    34 (x2)

    I feel like the whole campaign is confusing. It is difficult to tell exactly what is happening on the planet (no overall narratives) and the battle reports don't seem to have much to do with the outcomes of battles. Also, the color system to monitor progress seems bizarre. There have been times where a race has done quite well numbers wise only to recieve a lower color coding than would be appropriate. The battle reports requiring multiple players to sign on created a barrier to me. It isn't always easy to get an opponent's confirmation for a battle. And although it may have reduced minor cheating problems (people entering false favorable battles for themselves), it may have created more (in addition to making the process a hassle for gamers). Gamers can simply not confirm the battles where they did poorly. Other loopholes can undoubtedly found. ::sigh::

  8. #7
    Son of LO
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,425
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    252 (x0)

    Well, overall, I think GW will (hopefully) learn something from this, seeing that almost everyone seems to be very unsatisfied with the overall result.

    That being said, I'm going to close this, since it doesn't seem to be much more than moaning.

    Closed.

Closed Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts