Shoot The Freaking Big Ones - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    50
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Does the Shoot the big oes only appy to "size" creatures such as the bigger organisims?

    For example, can Gaunts screen Stealers?

    Or is it that Sze doesent matter and that your opponent can soot a ripper swarm behnd your warriors if he so pleases?

    I only ask because I hear conflicting reports.

    Thanks



    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FIRE RULES!


  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    LO Zealot
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,961
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputation
    35 (x4)

    STBO is just the name of the rule, the actual rule takes away all screening options from the tyranid army. So you can shoot even a ripper base that is hiding behind a carnifex.

    jwu

  4. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    50
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Grrrrrrr. Crap. That takes away all logic in the game!

    Oh-well, I'll just have to get around it.

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    the name of the rule is decieving. it should just be the "shoot anything you want" rule.
    -Can I pretend this guardian is an Exarch?
    -Well, I'll just pretend this jellybean is a Dreadnought, then when it's destroyed I can eat it!

  6. #5
    Senior Member Orestes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Miami, Fl
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x2)

    Ya around here nids are rare(i was the only player and I traded them off) The rule doesn't make sence. I wish they would rephrase it
    <img src='http://www.turnsignalsonalandraider.com/comics/000127.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    675
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x2)

    Or change it. Maybe they could do the same thing that they did with the Grots and Orks. If the "cover" save is passed, than take off a Grot, if failed, an Ork dies. Maybe something like that.

  8. #7
    Senior Member Pandora's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    559
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x2)

    Uh.. Huh.. Did anyone see in second ed the Gaunts screening Stealers? I find it hard to believe you dislike the rule, unless you&#39;ve never seen a game like that.
    <a href='http://www.onpoint-marketing.com/stealth-marketing.htm' target='_blank'>The future of marketing is here&#33; Stealth Marketing&#33;</a>
    Wait, you mean that optimism isn&#39;t fashionable anymore?&#33;
    Lord of Smart-ass Youthimizzles.
    Soup&#39;s up, bitches&#33;

  9. #8
    Son of LO H0urg1ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    171 (x6)

    Shoot the big ones isn&#39;t that much of an inconvenience really. If you take enough of the little stuff (At least 40% of your army in Guants) then your opponents will quickly realize that if they don&#39;t shoot the CLOSEST stuff, then they will be in big big trouble. If you follow the 40% rule, then you will have 75 basic guants in your army. This is nothing to sneer at, when they can move 6", have fleet of claw, can charge 12" and all of them within 2" get full attacks.

    Most armies, IG aside, can only shoot so much per turn. This means that they will have to prioritize their shooting between the half million guants coming towards them, or the carnifex that won&#39;t make it into CC for another two turns. When you give your oppenent choices like these, you&#39;ll see that STBO won&#39;t come into play too much.

  10. #9
    Son of LO Uzi-99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Age
    37
    Posts
    3,181
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputation
    86 (x7)

    Or make it apply to every other army in the game as well...

    Wrote already elsewhere, but a very strong rumour is that screening will no longer be a part of 4th Edition. Which of course is beneficial to the &#39;Nids, since others will have to get used to rules the Tyranids already play by&#33;

    And the LD-check to check whether to shoot at something besides the closest target is better than what the Tyranids used to have.

    But won&#39;t know for certain before August when 4th Ed is out.
    "The meat things seek to destroy ourselves. They hunt us as we hunt them but they are weak and uncertain. The inferior flesh will be entirely destroyed, all biomatter consumed. Ourselves will fight to the last, all weak flesh must be devoured."

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Maybe Hourglass is on to something. Maybe the rule was designed to prevent people from having all "big ones". If you look at the fluff, a &#39;nid army would be 60% or more gaunts (not that anyone, myself included, really follows ALL the fluff for their armies, my Infantry Company, for example, has a surprising amount of armor). A clumsy bit of "social engineering" on the army list to be sure, but I think I understand what GW&#036; was going for now.

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts