| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Weekly Word: Pander ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Wanganui, New Zealand Age: 16
Posts: 2,156
Blog Entries: 6 Rep Power: 74 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |
Librarium Online - the forum for all your tabletop gaming needs. Librarium Online offers a wide variety of categories, all from choosing your army to building scenery for gameplay. With over 500 new members every month you can be sure that your questions will be answered. Get help from friendly experts around the world and share your work with us in the gallery or in your personal blog!
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Tennessee, USA Age: 21
Posts: 589
Rep Power: 31 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
*salutes svalene* now heres a good fight! two sides with very different armies but tons of firepower. My strategem of choice will again be the one that allows me to count the objective in my deployment zone as two objectives. Alternatively, if there is a good deal of forest cover on the board i would use the anti-plant bomb or whatever it is called, to get rid of alot of the forests and make a larger killing field. I will use the defence laser to target the furthest away units hugging the corners and hopefully force them into the middle/open. The hammerheads and broadsides, while needing a 5+ to take a point off of a wall section, without question have enough combined firepower to bring down on average one or two sections of wall. But the return lascannon and missile fire will prove very telling so i doubt my opponent would put his assets out in the open, while my fast units could just as easily boost or jump or fleet to the objectives. I can see there being a high chance of a tie in this game if my opponent hides until the end and then goes for the objectives, but i have the advantage of indirect fire pounding away, so i should have the firepower and staying power to win this match.
__________________ VASSAL record: too many, gave up counting. rough estimates of 10% even steven, 25% omg i lostorz! and 65% PWNED NEWBS! ^^ <Tossy> Crons are freaking invincible! Last edited by lastspartacus; September 4th, 2008 at 04:43.. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Silver Daemon Winner ![]() |
Well time is ticking on, and Svalene still hasn't posted her tactics. That said I have spoken to her at length on Chat about what she is planning to do. Basically I think in this case the massed bombardment and that defense laser is going to mash up the skimmers, and the rest of LS gun-line has a nice platform to smash the rest. LS biggest problem is taking one objective and contesting the other. A lot depends on terrain. I don't think svalene is going to have enough terrain to hide enough of her army basically. A fairly close battle but I just think svalene's army is going to be slowly dismantled over 5 turns. At the end LS will probably have enough power to seize one of the objectives and contest the other. Last Spartacus For the Win
__________________ "God is dead" Nietzsche- 1886 "Nietzsche is dead" God- 1900 Is Abbadon such a big deal? Check out my blog to find out Member of the HISTORY GROUP "Q, you are a brilliant intellectual with the typing skills of an arthritic" lastspartacus |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Consumer of Christmas ![]() Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,402
Rep Power: 58 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Can't really vote for this one. I want Sparty in a one on one, which is unfair for Sval who got in the middle of it =P Post some tactics you silly Dark space elf! your lists has the power, but I don't know how you use it.
__________________ Member of the Brutally Honest Critics Society-"Telling you what others are really thinking" ![]() If someone helps you over and over again and you Forget to rep them, Remember: This cat has claws Removed by the moderators. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Tennessee, USA Age: 21
Posts: 589
Rep Power: 31 ![]() ![]() ![]() | GW Online : Warhammer 40,000 : Apocalypse : Apocalypse Datasheets it was brought to my attention my defence laser link was broken.
__________________ VASSAL record: too many, gave up counting. rough estimates of 10% even steven, 25% omg i lostorz! and 65% PWNED NEWBS! ^^ <Tossy> Crons are freaking invincible! |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Queen of Commoragh ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Paris,France Age: 16
Posts: 623
Rep Power: 46 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ok,sorry for taking a long time to post my tactics lol. So The stratagem i would use will be vital objective which i will use on the objective in my deployment zone, since sparty really has to few mobile units to hope to capture it. I Would deploy my army in this way: The hammerheads and broadsides between 48-72 inches of the defense laser (out of range of all his lascannons/missile launchers), my kroots deployed forward in cover near/on the objectives, my stealth suits deployed near the kroots behind the objectives, since we using 4th ed rule they'd be out of los if behind size 3 terrain, and i would keep all my crisis suits in reserve. On the first few turns my kroots and stealth will do nothing apart from getting shot at, i expect them to take heavy losses, but i think that if they are in cover,they have the number to survive through 2-3 turns of shooting. I don't know whether sparty will fire his bassies on my kroots, or on my hammerheads and broadsides, but i don't think it would make a great difference. Meanwhile my Broadsides and Hammerhead will fire continuously on the defense laser,with 11 railgun shots a turn it should be dead on turn 2,maybe turn 1 if i get a bit lucky. After they killed it they'll target wall sections and the hammerheads will move forward a bit. And on turn 2 my crisis suits will start coming in from deepstrike, I will place them behind or on the sides of the bassies, Im sure i'll lose a few to bad scatter, but a good amount should make it safely and they will start killing all the bassies 1 by 1,even a plasma rifle has a decent chance of killing one.I'll also try to keep them in cover/out of los of the wall sections, i know i won't be able to do it with all of them but if im able to hide a few until the end of the game and i have last turn they could contest his vital objectives. And even if i can't hide any, he'll have to stop shooting at my army for a turn to take care of my suits. In last 2 turns i expect sparty to try to grab or contest the objectives in the middle, but imo he has too few units for that job and i should be able to shoot them down easily. So yea,that's my plan lol.
__________________ -A tau, dark eldar and slaanesh csm player -vassal player -And always on LO chat.. Last edited by Svalene; September 5th, 2008 at 07:08.. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Justitia Omnibus Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 172
Rep Power: 33 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I just want to say I like both lists, and I think this would be a great battle to actually take a part in! After much deliberation, I think Svalene's tactics are fairly sound, and thus, I vote for her. However, props to both of you on making great lists. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Zeus's personal help desk ![]() Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: The wop-wops (Palmerston North, New Zealand) Age: 17
Posts: 2,669
Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 64 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Neither side can really do a go-get-em type of tactic. Sval's list looks better as far as gunlines go, and is more organised. Sparty's force is too mixed. -AFG//
__________________ ![]() ![]() "A fool and his money are a girl's best friend"- Some T-shirt |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Apocalyptic Batttle 1: Svalene vs Boo | Pickle | 40k Votewar | 13 | August 30th, 2008 14:00 |
| Apocalyptic Batttle 3: Helbrecht vs lastspartacus | Pickle | 40k Votewar | 14 | August 30th, 2008 10:58 |