Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheWamp I'd say aim for 32 lists as it makes single elimination easiest and it makes it so that no one from the original gets excluded. I know my list never got posted. I'm PMing you a copy. |
Yeah, I've already recieved quite a few entries, which is great. It looks like quite a few people were excluded, so I'm shooting for 32. I'd rather not go with 24, as that'll eventually lead to someone getting a bye (Free win, basically).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheWamp Also, there was a rule that Sareld had, that I'd like to keep that you didn't mention: if you don't post 1 or 2 sentences, your vote doesn't count. Can we keep that? |
Absolutely. The whole point of VoteWar is to see how your list will do against random opponents and recieve feedback from a wide variety of players rather than just the people who lurk in that particular army's subforum. I fully expect some form of reasoning as to your Objectives vote. Stating "I agree" will not suffice either - I want atleast some form of explanation. Even if you end up repeating someone's original statement, sometimes it is helpful to hear criticism from multiple points of view.
I had a question about the fluff voting, so I thought I'd clarify a bit. Voting on fluff will not be mandatory, and as it's only meant for tie breakers it's not critical you give reasoning behind the vote either. It would be nice, however.
Ezekiel had the idea of naming this VoteWar 2.5. I'm all for it, so I have thus dubbed this round as VoteWar 2.5.