Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
Other (Please state)
As with the other thread, this one has two purposes.
#1- Assembling a team of organisers
Since I am only one person, my powers are limited, and I also am well aware that I will not always be driven to get this things completed (as the last week has been proof of). For that reason, I wish to assemble a team of about three-four people who will help me organise this.
Duties will include stuff like working on how this will work (more on that later), editing the content of the Campaign PDF,
repping SlaaneshyWHO PUT THAT THERE???; helping to actually run the thing, amongst other menial and degrading chores that I haven't yet thought of.
Post here, on my profile, or PM me if interested, but please take note that an application won't necessarily mean acceptance.
#2- Establishing how the Campaign will be run
This is where the poll will be run. Whilst the ultimate decision will be left with the aforementioned team /\, this here is a chance to get your say in the matter, which should be influential when the decision is made.
Basically, vote based on what you would like to see as the/a primary focus for the Campaign. Fluff-based will result in a narrative-heavy approach, Participation-based will result in a Campaign that matters pretty much solely on people playing (kind of like the NC or a School Sports day), Individual glory-based will probably make its way in anyway, and is as it says on the tin: celebrating individual achievements, and Allegiance-based will be about the members of a various faction working together to claim a victory for the allegiance itself (like what GW have been known to do), and Other is there because I'm open to ideas.
Last edited by ArchonFarseerGuy; January 21st, 2009 at 00:12.
I'm for the fluff version. As long as the manner in which armies score is worked out, then I do not see why this would not work.
I will also put my services up for hire. I will try to help as much as I am able, I have access to various FB resources.
Im not sure I'll be qualified for any leader roles but I'd be more than willing to lend a hand where it's needed.
5000p. High Elves
and i wholeheartedly agree which is why i voted "other". I'm not really sure what my idea would be counted under. Kind of allegiance, kind of participation, with a little fluff thrown in.
I'll also help run this thing, as long as I get to participate as well. Getting on these forums is becoming a habit of mine. The whole army-builder thing became rather redundant though, since everyone wanted alot of the same crap written 8 different ways.
Right, I now have a rough idea of who I want on the team, but will be consulting a higher-up or few to try and get their thoughts.
Ideally, an organiser should have MSN or be a Chat regular (or both), since communication will be of the essence.
And again, I apologise for my lack of activity on this front.
No rush is it?
I think everyone will be happy as long as we manage to run a campaign where everyone can have fun, and time won't be vital.
5000p. High Elves
Oh, look, its April already. And just look at how much we've gotten done, if feel soooo proud.
I think it may have been better that this thing died. It takes some highly dedicated people to run something like this. I'm not even that kind of person- i've backed out of Army Builder, a Dev. Team, tons of Blogs. AFG is probably just busy, or spreading out his interests across the site or (gasp) RL. Better that the plane never gets off the ground, rather than crash mid-flight.