LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksLooking forward to it Karantalsis (i still miss that first "s"), and good to have you back
Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
Register Now!
User Tag List
+ Reply to Thread
Results 61 to 68 of 68
Thread: Dark Eldar Tactica 2011
- Dark Eldar Gerbil
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Sydney
- Age
- 30
- Posts
- 1,522
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
- 159 (x5)
Dear Game Developer,Caps-Lock, its like cruise-control for AWESOMENESS!
Rock is cheese, Paper is just fine
Signed Scissors.
WWP and other Dark Eldar how to
http://forums.relicnews.com/showthread.php?t=149386
- Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
- Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Age
- 23
- Posts
- 1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
- 1 (x0)
like this tactica and agree with it about most of it warriors are gods among mortals
but not with the webway lists not in 5th ed at least ... didnt read through every page but they really arent as good and can just use the points for the portal and carriers in more wyches/jetbikes.
wyche armies ive found work iin small games 1k and less often because its so fast and will kill everything it comes into without too many units to go through
- Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 226
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
- 18 (x1)
Why is this thread labelled "Dark Eldar Tactica 2011" when it was started in 2008?
- The other Kind of Fluff
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- with Alice
- Age
- 36
- Posts
- 8,842
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 2 Thread(s)
- 946 (x8)
Because the thread has since been updated in order to reflect the current changes in the Eldar Codex (title included).
Originally Posted by sim_james 
Spambot kill tally. . .337
- Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 226
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
- 18 (x1)
Has it? I was reading through the posts on page 1 and they all reference options from the old codex.
- Dark Eldar Zealot
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Menai Sydney Australia
- Age
- 52
- Posts
- 3,696
- Mentioned
- 2 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
- 434 (x8)
And yet the 'updates' show otherwise. Originally Posted by sim_james
It seems a common and courteous policy not to delete what has gone before when so much work has gone into posts trying to help others and indeed some players still use the old Codex rules from time to time!
Cheers.In a controversy the instant we feel anger we have already ceased striving for the truth, and have begun striving for ourselves.
- Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Leuven, Belgium
- Age
- 32
- Posts
- 350
- Mentioned
- 4 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
- 42 (x1)
I don't see any updates a part from the 5th edition coming in place. It does seem more logical to call this thread "Dark Eldar Tactica Previous Codex".
It is quite confusing title now.
- The Dvl in Pale Moonlight
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Stockholm, Sweden
- Age
- 30
- Posts
- 889
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Tagged
- 0 Thread(s)
- 121 (x3)
Index it as a previous tactica and start a new thread. That is what we did over the dark elf boards when the book got updated. A new-comer, who is probably the ones who will look for this thread the most, you have to wade through X amount of pages to finally getting to something relevant can be daunting. Indeed, we probably will confuse them to no end as rules clash with each other. So yeah, I'd say un-sticky and index the thread and mark it as a previous edition tactica. Just a thought.
""What's the matter? Don't ya like clowns? Don't we make ya laugh?" - Captain Spaulding.
Reply With QuoteLinkBacks (?)
- August 30th, 2008, 15:07
- July 1st, 2008, 06:03
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts