| |||||||
| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login | |
| Dark Eldar Fear not the darkness, fear that which the darkness hides. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #91 (permalink) |
| Scourge Lord ![]() Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 35 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | But it's that I knew better than to really expect that... whoa, that logic just made me dizzy... Honestly, I don't really mind not being able to buy new DE models right now. It's hard enough to pay for the essentials these days, let alone a hobby like 40K. But GW needs to throw us a bone on the rules front. The army is just not fun to play in 5th edition like it was in 3rd. Just drop a few hints. That's all I'm asking for, y'know?
__________________ My projects » Tukosra's Folly » Vehicle Design Rules » DE Fandex » 10,500 pts BatRep |
| | |
Librarium Online - the forum for all your tabletop gaming needs. Librarium Online offers a wide variety of categories, all from choosing your army to building scenery for gameplay. With over 500 new members every month you can be sure that your questions will be answered. Get help from friendly experts around the world and share your work with us in the gallery or in your personal blog!
| | #92 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Walesland
Posts: 113
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Wow, it is a black day when Beasts of Chaos get done before us... Oh well. Being a Nid player I don't mind the new niddiness quite so much, plus the dex is from 2004, surprisingly. But DE do need some love, and GW have been pressured about it for years now. I still think it's gonna happen, we can't be ignored. Witch Hunters get played less than we do, we're actually used to an extent. I know two other DE players, we're not THAT rare... The model hate thing is also due to the paint jobs. I do think they should redo some of them, my Wyches are way better than the way they paint theirs. Warriors too are another thing - mine are based off the front cover of the dex, and that looks beautiful on the battlefield. The schemes in the book are a bit too 90's cheesiness... As for the Necrons vs. DE thing, I can tell you Crons need it more. But really they both deserve a new dex, and what's worrying me more than anything is the rumour of the Blood Angels following the Nids, possibly via space hulk aftermath. I can see some point to that, at the moment they have no physical codex unless you have a printer, and there's nothing in that list that makes you want to take them over the Ultramarine- Sorry, Space Marine codex (no, wait, I was right the first time). But seriously, GW are pushing it. I'll give them two more 40k dexes after the Nid one. If they still haven't gotten round to it, or at least given some rumours, then I'm pretty much gonna give up on the new dex. I'm a new player, only been using them for just over a year, so I've no idea how harsh it's been for veteran players, but still, GW needs to pull its finger out. I have faith, due to the fact we've still not been dropped, but... |
| | |
| | #93 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Walesland
Posts: 113
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11 ![]() |
Wow, it is a black day when Beasts of Chaos get done before us... Oh well. Being a Nid player I don't mind the new niddiness quite so much, plus the dex is from 2004, surprisingly. But DE do need some love, and GW have been pressured about it for years now. I still think it's gonna happen, we can't be ignored. Witch Hunters get played less than we do, we're actually used to an extent. I know two other DE players, we're not THAT rare... The model hate thing is also due to the paint jobs. I do think they should redo some of them, my Wyches are way better than the way they paint theirs. Warriors too are another thing - mine are based off the front cover of the dex, and that looks beautiful on the battlefield. The schemes in the book are a bit too 90's cheesiness... As for the Necrons vs. DE thing, I can tell you Crons need it more. But really they both deserve a new dex, and what's worrying me more than anything is the rumour of the Blood Angels following the Nids, possibly via space hulk aftermath. I can see some point to that, at the moment they have no physical codex unless you have a printer, and there's nothing in that list that makes you want to take them over the Ultramarine- Sorry, Space Marine codex (no, wait, I was right the first time). But seriously, GW are pushing it. I'll give them two more 40k dexes after the Nid one. If they still haven't gotten round to it, or at least given some rumours, then I'm pretty much gonna give up on the new dex. I'm a new player, only been using them for just over a year, so I've no idea how harsh it's been for veteran players, but still, GW needs to pull its finger out. I have faith, due to the fact we've still not been dropped, but... |
| | |
| | #94 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Age: 21
Posts: 861
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i feel like from a hobby perspective whoever has the oldest models should get the updates first they're in it to make money, why are they redoing books that already have people buying them they need to diversify to increase profits. if people can only buy 1 thing you're going to hit a sales cap.
__________________ My Black Templar WIP |
| | |
| | #95 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
My 2 armies currently are DE (million year old codex), and witch hunters (2million year old codex)! This sucks, both are cool armies full of character and interesting, a little bit off main stream, but now confined to the dark cobwebbed corners of GW. So I thought about updating to a new army, but the only one that really takes my fancy at the moment is the black templars.... what to do, any other thoughts for interesting armies??
|
| | |
| | #96 (permalink) | |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 66
Blog Entries: 1 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 13 ![]() |
Lol Barnacle has te 2 rarest 40k armies lol. Quote:
Usually when you have several kids you feed them all, you simply don't forget about one of two of your kids... | |
| | |
| | #97 (permalink) | |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7 ![]() | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #98 (permalink) |
| Scourge Lord ![]() Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 35 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would suggest CWE, barnacle. They are extremely interesting on all fronts of the game (models, backstory, rules, tactics, attitude, fun factor). And on top of that, they are extremely powerful if used correctly, and probably the most versatile army list to work with (which means you can play them in many different ways and still be successful). It's pretty much a guarantee that GW will never allow the CWE to become outdated like they have done with the DE. BTW, it's funny to me that this thread is almost at 100 posts when I started it mostly just to vent off some steam.
__________________ My projects » Tukosra's Folly » Vehicle Design Rules » DE Fandex » 10,500 pts BatRep |
| | |
| | #99 (permalink) |
| Where's me lucky Charms ![]() Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Ireland Age: 28
Posts: 461
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 42 ![]() ![]() |
been watching this thread for a while and i will throw in my 2 cents havn't posted in a while but i intend to be more pro-active on LO. just a few things i would like to say: our codex as it stands IMO is far supperior to alot of armies, infact i would go as far to say that DE is the most powerful army in 5th edition now. when i field them(which is not often, i'm a chaos fanatic now) my friends get all up in arms saying that they are too good and will get nerfed in the new codex, that they are way to good now, i will admit that we have alot of useless units, this is very true. however the units we do have work tremendously well. I'll not go into the tactics at the mo but i'm sure everyone here has figured it out, we get cover from almost everything and our raiders dont really go crashing into oblivion anymore, something that 4th edition really messed up for us has been fixed, DE was decent in 4th, in 5th they are amazing, a great return to the DE glory days of 3rd. i for one dont want a new codex, one of my main issues with wanting a new codex in the past was cause DE was very dated and was not keeping up well with 4th edition rules. this has all changed for the better in the introduction to 5th, if and when we get a new codex expect a few well loved treasures to be gone when the other units are brought more up to speed. this will sadden me most as i love them now more than ever. they now do what they where intended to do, well at least how i play them.. Strike fear into your enemies. i for one would like to see units brought up to speed and new models, but this i fear is going to come at a hefty cost to our loved units which work so well now.
__________________ LOVE THY RAIDER LOVE THY DISINTEGRATOR |
| | |
| | #100 (permalink) | |
| Junior Member Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7 ![]() | Quote:
Last edited by negZero; November 8th, 2009 at 05:15. | |
| | |
![]() |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Decapitator what should I expect? | pathtyphon | Dark Eldar | 4 | June 10th, 2009 12:44 |
| What can I expect from Empire? | stoof | Wood Elves | 6 | December 25th, 2008 02:50 |
| What can I expect from 1k points? | biadetic | Tomb Kings | 10 | December 4th, 2008 17:50 |
| What to expect from witch hunters | Predanuke | Tau Empire | 9 | July 22nd, 2006 19:27 |
| Need to know what to expect[BA] | Commissar_Malevich | Space Marines | 12 | April 19th, 2006 15:11 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |