What is the most competitive Fast Attack - Page 4 - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

View Poll Results: Which Fast Attack do you prefer?

Voters
43. You may not vote on this poll
  • Hellions

    6 13.95%
  • Scourges

    4 9.30%
  • Reaver Jetbikes

    27 62.79%
  • Beastmasters

    6 13.95%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Age
    29
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    7 (x1)

    Aim split, reavers for caltrops (not turbo boosting = dead) and scourges for AT, heat lance out of portal, haywire from board edge. Looking forward to trying beast masters just need to find the points


  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #32
    Member rag doll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    inside your brain
    Posts
    118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    3 (x1)

    Thanks a lot
    Rag doll
    'A good soldier obeys without question.
    A good oficer commands without doubt'
    -tactica imperium

  4. #33
    Junior Member Patzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    8 (x1)

    What do you guys used for squad size with reavers? the min 3? or more? Gimme some feedback!
    n00b Ork and DE player.

  5. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputation
    30 (x1)

    Quote Originally Posted by Patzer View Post
    What do you guys used for squad size with reavers? the min 3? or more? Gimme some feedback!
    I'm a big fan of 6.
    Its enough to get 2 special weapons (I prefer the blasters since you double tough T4).

    9 means it's to hard to hide behind cover.
    3 means if one guy dies you have might be fleeing.

  6. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    El Paso TX
    Posts
    484
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputation
    68 (x1)

    Reavers at 3 have been a waste in my experience. They really can't accomplish much except over time but they're fragile enough that they don't get that time.

    In my honest opinion we have better units that do what reavers do. At 2500 points when the force org chart makes you take some fast attack then take 6.

  7. #36
    Archite of Caerbannog KwiKwag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    SJ Bay Area
    Posts
    1,582
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Blog Entries
    5

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    225 (x6)

    I've only ever used them at 6, haven't tried 3 yet and I am not going to.
    "On a hunch, I melted them down and inhaled the fumes and read the dark eldar codex again, AND FOUND A BUNCH OF NEW RULES HIDDEN BEHIND THE OTHER WORDS..." [Gardeth on modelling & interpreting the DE Codex]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts