Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
hi i was just wondering if anyone could help me choose between vampire counts and dwarfs. i think dwarfs are good cuase runes and lots of shooty stuff and their normal warriors are great!.but they dont have magic
but i also like vampire counts as they have lots of good magic and and fear .and i love grave gaurd.but they arnt that good in combat and they dont have shooting.
although i thought maybe taking some leadbelchers in vampire counts as dogs of war what do you guys think ?
what style do u like? Dwarves are kinda slow and steady and shooty. They also take a bit of skill to use.
VC 's troops are complete crap, but with the right combinations, and magic, they can be devastating(thanks to raising and the vampires).
MOre or less: Dwarves got good troops (really good) and VC got powerful characters in comparison to the troops (quite good)
AND dwarves got no spells
VC relies on heavy magic, so if u dun like rely on unstable stuff, dun get them. My necro blew his own brains out cuz of a miscast.
But as a collecter of VC, and a person who lieks relying on blasting green forces of flame across the battlefield and incinerating enemies other than standing there shooting away, I would recommend VC.
PS: I had the same situation as you before. They are too VERY different armies, see which style u like better. VC is no range (pratically) and dwarves have TONS of range( ALOT)
HOPE THAT HELPS ^_^
Well VC is more of an offensive Army. And the Dwarfs are great for Defensive Army. And if you prefer blasting away at your enemy pick dwarfs(at least that what I do ) or if you like seeing your enemy fleeing before your eyes I recommend VC. Hope I helped
Join the Musician Corps. LO's finest
The Musician Clan
The Star Wars Clan
GET ER DONE!
thanks this has helped me but i still dont know....
i really like dwarf shooting but hate that they cant hasve magic or cav .
i am a bit towards vc but i am not sure if i am that good with them as they are very weak and dont really want to rely on chracters..
i am starting to see the good pont of every army now its gets harder !
I would go for the dwarfs as they are really reliable, dwarfs need more stunties so we gobbos can smash em
"Fight like gobbos"- Skarsnik
id go with dwarfs, they got high leadership very resistant ( like high tough and armour) and their incredible war machines make up for thier shortage of magic, well anvil of doom has magic . anyways and for the calvery part , i personally dont like them cus they usualy rely on just charging , well for the vc ones anyways , u want GOOD calvery ?? take bretonnia or chaos!! ( chaos kinghts are truely amazing and very hard to kill.
your most powerful enemy is the one that has nothing to loose
i dont really like armys that consentrate on 1 thing thats why i dont know about dwarfs i thin they are a bit to shooty and the models dnt look that great
i had the same problem u had not liking that lack of magic or cav at all but if ur undecided choose dwarfs becuase you'll just fall in love w/ there little stuntiness and beards and just want to buy more!(o and we do got the anvil of DOOM)
Well dwarfs aren't all about shooting, I play the Slayer army, the slayer throng of karak kadrin, so very little shooting here and it works great.
My regular dwarfs only have a hewer and 1 unit of thunderers, the rest is infantry and gyrocopters!