| |||||||
| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login | |
| Eldar Your Understanding Is Not Required Mon-Keigh, Merely Your Surrender... |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Age: 27
Posts: 196
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 44 ![]() | Unfortunately, I don't see this happening with rangers. They are very expensive, especially if you upgrade to Pathfinders, which I always would want to do. The good things are that Pathfinders would be nearly invulnerable in ruin-style area terrain (at least from long range attacks) and can infiltrate into that sweet spot from the get-go. The problem is firepower. Yes, they get AP1 quite often, but those AP1 shots are determined before you roll to wound, so that AP1 shot may not even cause a wound and you only wound half the time. I think this is a solid defensive unit that will probably survive each game, but my concern is that it simply wouldn't do enough damage to make itself worthwhile. Does anyone else have any experience or thoughts on this issue? I know eldar aren't really space-elves, but sometimes I think of them like Tolkien-style elves and I just love the epitomy of those elves being desplayed in the characteristics of pathfinders . . . . . . what do you think?
__________________ "There will never be enough peace in the universe unless first there is enough war." - Farseer Eleuflin |
| | |
Librarium Online - the forum for all your tabletop gaming needs. Librarium Online offers a wide variety of categories, all from choosing your army to building scenery for gameplay. With over 500 new members every month you can be sure that your questions will be answered. Get help from friendly experts around the world and share your work with us in the gallery or in your personal blog!
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Shadow Captain ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Virginia, USA Age: 20
Posts: 11,983
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 147 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I read somewhere else someone saying the following: "Rangers aren't worth it. Pathfinders, on the other hand, are." I agree with that person. For the points, Pathfinders are a very durable unit capable of dishing out a lot of pain to MC's, and even to Troops squads. With their increased cover save, they can take a lot of shooting (as long as you stay away from things like Flamers, CC units, etc.) and with those sniper rifles, coupled with the improved chances of getting the low AP, they can put the hurt on. Rangers, on the other hand, are a little too expensive for what you get. Plus, the models are terrific! I'd go with a squad of 6 Pathfinders, and maybe even a second squad if you're playing on a terrain-dense field, or playing Cities of Death. Pathfinders with a 2+ cover save would be excellent. ^_^
__________________ |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Harvester of Souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 411
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 50 ![]() |
Ugh, the main thing I hate about this new codex is that now there are a million and one choices to fill the elite spots. Pathfinders are good but they seem to pale, for me at least, when compared to your banshees, scorps, harlies, or fire dragons. As for rangers, I'm trying to see how they work out as troop choices and seeing how often they can successfully pin an enemy squad; they seemed to work ok in the old codex when you could use them in squads of 3 but now I don't know if the minimum cost of 95 is worth one pin test.
__________________ Kai Shin Craftworld (Biel Tan / Ulthwe) 5000 pts Emperor's Children 2000 pts [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Shadow Captain ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Virginia, USA Age: 20
Posts: 11,983
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 147 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
__________________ | |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Harvester of Souls Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 411
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 50 ![]() |
True enough. Doh. Stupid old codex is stuck in my mind.
__________________ Kai Shin Craftworld (Biel Tan / Ulthwe) 5000 pts Emperor's Children 2000 pts [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Son of LO ![]() Join Date: Nov 2005 Age: 21
Posts: 2,462
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0 ![]() | That's correct. Rangers that are upgraded to Pathfinders don't become anything different - they remain as Troops. That should help you take all of your fancy Elites and still include Pathfinders in your army.:sleep:
|
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Son of LO ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: South Australia Age: 23
Posts: 2,036
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 60 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Question: What the heck is the SX supposed to be when shooting at tanks? A lot of Eldar players seem to spend a bit over 100 points on a unit of 10+ Guardians with a heavy weapon platform. (and normally with a warlock + conceal = more like 14 ![]() Really that's paying well over 100 points for basically 1 weapon. While it is a more powerful weapon, the squad itself is less efficient point for point because that weapon is the only thing shooting. A squad of 5/6 rangers/pathfinders costs roughly the same, and you can shoot with ALL of them. Not to mention they get a good cover save without paying for a warlock (provided there IS cover). So, the long rifles might not pack the punch of a starcannon or bright lance, but with all 5+ shooting (rather than 1-2 shots), I think it would score more kills. For the same amount of points. And lets not forget about the higher Ballistic skill :yes: As for the AP1 hits still being difficult to wound with.. Cast Doom on whatever they are shooting at.. Personally I prefer Dire Avengers, but what Im saying is if you are willing to take a unit of guardians with platform, then why NOT take rangers/pathfinders?
__________________ 'The only thing required for the truimph of evil, is for good men to do nothing..' Dark Elves W L D 18 3 3 Game #24 vs Dwarves: Massacre (win) Last edited by Manu_Forti; November 24th, 2006 at 08:37. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Son of LO ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Australian. Capital. Territory Age: 19
Posts: 3,462
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 74 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hey in the old codex we had rangers without pathfinders and they were a perfectly viable option. Rangers are brilliant in cityfight. They can hold buildings down and pin enemies down that try to stop them. But its not only cityfight they are good at. They are used mostly to pin squads rather than actual kill. Of course if you vs necrons, orks or chaos don't expect much return other than to hold objectives with a wonderful cover save. Against other vulnerable armies you can pin just about any unit with t heir ap1 ability. They are used to get into an out of the way objective, like a loot counter or failing that to simply find the best cover on the board. Don't forget they can still fleet somewhere else and they still have pistols. I have to admit that the upgrade to pathfinders makes them much better though. I've had a lot of luck with a 5 man ranger squad before. They have saved me many games by holding objectives close to my deployment zone whilst my army advanced. Or they have held a building on the left as my falcons lure their army down the right side. They love cleanse too. Easy quarter.
__________________ Check out my Codex: Farmyard Animals here! If anyone wants any kind of help writing fluff for any kind of GW army just ask. Fluffmaster Anzac Clan |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: May 2006 Age: 20
Posts: 479
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 45 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have no idea why (what with their high leadership) but my rangers have IN EVERY GAME fled off the table. It's like 'oh wow, those guys just exploded, let's ALL run!' They are cursed like this, so when I paint them, they will be getting Neon Green Jumpsuits and purple / pink robes.
__________________ Gareth is the person I try to impress when I convert and paint. |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Son of LO ![]() Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Australian. Capital. Territory Age: 19
Posts: 3,462
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 74 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mine have only ever run once. Sitting in a building with a 3+ cover save. Got shot by a pair of lascannons. Both hit, both wound I fail both saves rangers run, fail to rally, flee the board. Slightly annoying but it was extremely unlucky. Rangers don't suck becaue of that one situation.
__________________ Check out my Codex: Farmyard Animals here! If anyone wants any kind of help writing fluff for any kind of GW army just ask. Fluffmaster Anzac Clan |
| | |
![]() |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pathfinder sheatfish. | Shas'O RenoSaurus | Tau Empire | 11 | August 14th, 2005 14:06 |
| pathfinder withOUT devilfish | suzaraki | Tau Empire | 12 | April 22nd, 2005 01:20 |
| Pathfinder | white scar | Tau Empire | 32 | February 15th, 2005 13:35 |
| Pathfinder Railrifles | Kurdt | Tau Empire | 2 | January 1st, 1970 01:00 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |