+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Ranger/Pathfinder uses?

  1. #1

    Ranger/Pathfinder uses?

    One of my favorite model and fluff specific units in the new eldar codex is the ranger/pathfinder and I would love to find an every game use for them that will actually be beneficial. I understand I can use any unit I like no matter what, but I'd really like them to be at least somewhat effective as well.

    Unfortunately, I don't see this happening with rangers. They are very expensive, especially if you upgrade to Pathfinders, which I always would want to do. The good things are that Pathfinders would be nearly invulnerable in ruin-style area terrain (at least from long range attacks) and can infiltrate into that sweet spot from the get-go. The problem is firepower. Yes, they get AP1 quite often, but those AP1 shots are determined before you roll to wound, so that AP1 shot may not even cause a wound and you only wound half the time.

    I think this is a solid defensive unit that will probably survive each game, but my concern is that it simply wouldn't do enough damage to make itself worthwhile. Does anyone else have any experience or thoughts on this issue?

    I know eldar aren't really space-elves, but sometimes I think of them like Tolkien-style elves and I just love the epitomy of those elves being desplayed in the characteristics of pathfinders . . .

    . . . what do you think?
    "There will never be enough peace in the universe unless first there is enough war." - Farseer Eleuflin

  2. #2
    LO's Shadow Captain Lost Nemesis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Age
    21
    Posts
    12,475
    Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment.
    158

    I read somewhere else someone saying the following:

    "Rangers aren't worth it. Pathfinders, on the other hand, are."

    I agree with that person.

    For the points, Pathfinders are a very durable unit capable of dishing out a lot of pain to MC's, and even to Troops squads. With their increased cover save, they can take a lot of shooting (as long as you stay away from things like Flamers, CC units, etc.) and with those sniper rifles, coupled with the improved chances of getting the low AP, they can put the hurt on. Rangers, on the other hand, are a little too expensive for what you get.

    Plus, the models are terrific!

    I'd go with a squad of 6 Pathfinders, and maybe even a second squad if you're playing on a terrain-dense field, or playing Cities of Death. Pathfinders with a 2+ cover save would be excellent. ^_^

  3. #3
    Harvester of Souls hsin_dragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    410
    hsin_dragon is getting kicks on route LXVI
    54

    Ugh, the main thing I hate about this new codex is that now there are a million and one choices to fill the elite spots. Pathfinders are good but they seem to pale, for me at least, when compared to your banshees, scorps, harlies, or fire dragons. As for rangers, I'm trying to see how they work out as troop choices and seeing how often they can successfully pin an enemy squad; they seemed to work ok in the old codex when you could use them in squads of 3 but now I don't know if the minimum cost of 95 is worth one pin test.
    Kai Shin Craftworld (Biel Tan / Ulthwe) 5000 pts
    Emperor's Children 2000 pts
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  4. #4
    LO's Shadow Captain Lost Nemesis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Age
    21
    Posts
    12,475
    Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment. Lost Nemesis Relax. You have achieved enlightenment.
    158

    Quote Originally Posted by hsin_dragon View Post
    Ugh, the main thing I hate about this new codex is that now there are a million and one choices to fill the elite spots. Pathfinders are good but they seem to pale, for me at least, when compared to your banshees, scorps, harlies, or fire dragons. As for rangers, I'm trying to see how they work out as troop choices and seeing how often they can successfully pin an enemy squad; they seemed to work ok in the old codex when you could use them in squads of 3 but now I don't know if the minimum cost of 95 is worth one pin test.
    I believe Pathfinders are Troops chioces.. as they're simply upgraded Rangers.

  5. #5
    Harvester of Souls hsin_dragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    410
    hsin_dragon is getting kicks on route LXVI
    54

    True enough. Doh. Stupid old codex is stuck in my mind.
    Kai Shin Craftworld (Biel Tan / Ulthwe) 5000 pts
    Emperor's Children 2000 pts
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  6. #6
    Son of LO
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Age
    21
    Posts
    2,453
    Katie Drake is not welcome in these parts
    0

    Quote Originally Posted by Lost Nemesis View Post
    I believe Pathfinders are Troops chioces.. as they're simply upgraded Rangers.
    That's correct. Rangers that are upgraded to Pathfinders don't become anything different - they remain as Troops. That should help you take all of your fancy Elites and still include Pathfinders in your army.:sleep:

  7. #7
    Son of LO Manu_Forti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    South Australia
    Age
    23
    Posts
    1,950
    Manu_Forti has got eight and a half Manu_Forti has got eight and a half Manu_Forti has got eight and a half Manu_Forti has got eight and a half Manu_Forti has got eight and a half Manu_Forti has got eight and a half Manu_Forti has got eight and a half
    63

    Question: What the heck is the SX supposed to be when shooting at tanks?

    A lot of Eldar players seem to spend a bit over 100 points on a unit of 10+ Guardians with a heavy weapon platform. (and normally with a warlock + conceal = more like 14
    Really that's paying well over 100 points for basically 1 weapon. While it is a more powerful weapon, the squad itself is less efficient point for point because that weapon is the only thing shooting.
    A squad of 5/6 rangers/pathfinders costs roughly the same, and you can shoot with ALL of them. Not to mention they get a good cover save without paying for a warlock (provided there IS cover).

    So, the long rifles might not pack the punch of a starcannon or bright lance, but with all 5+ shooting (rather than 1-2 shots), I think it would score more kills. For the same amount of points.

    And lets not forget about the higher Ballistic skill :yes:
    As for the AP1 hits still being difficult to wound with.. Cast Doom on whatever they are shooting at..

    Personally I prefer Dire Avengers, but what Im saying is if you are willing to take a unit of guardians with platform, then why NOT take rangers/pathfinders?
    Last edited by Manu_Forti; November 24th, 2006 at 08:37.
    'The only thing required for the truimph of evil, is for good men to do nothing..'

    Dark Elves
    W L D
    18 3 3
    Game #24 vs Dwarves: Massacre (win)

  8. #8
    Son of LO LordLink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australian. Capital. Territory
    Age
    19
    Posts
    3,468
    LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future
    78

    Hey in the old codex we had rangers without pathfinders and they were a perfectly viable option.

    Rangers are brilliant in cityfight. They can hold buildings down and pin enemies down that try to stop them. But its not only cityfight they are good at. They are used mostly to pin squads rather than actual kill. Of course if you vs necrons, orks or chaos don't expect much return other than to hold objectives with a wonderful cover save. Against other vulnerable armies you can pin just about any unit with t heir ap1 ability.

    They are used to get into an out of the way objective, like a loot counter or failing that to simply find the best cover on the board. Don't forget they can still fleet somewhere else and they still have pistols.

    I have to admit that the upgrade to pathfinders makes them much better though.

    I've had a lot of luck with a 5 man ranger squad before. They have saved me many games by holding objectives close to my deployment zone whilst my army advanced. Or they have held a building on the left as my falcons lure their army down the right side.

    They love cleanse too. Easy quarter.
    Check out my Codex: Farmyard Animals here!

    If anyone wants any kind of help writing fluff for any kind of GW army just ask.

    Fluffmaster
    Anzac Clan

  9. #9

    I have no idea why (what with their high leadership) but my rangers have IN EVERY GAME fled off the table. It's like 'oh wow, those guys just exploded, let's ALL run!'

    They are cursed like this, so when I paint them, they will be getting Neon Green Jumpsuits and purple / pink robes.
    Gareth is the person I try to impress when I convert and paint.

  10. #10
    Son of LO LordLink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australian. Capital. Territory
    Age
    19
    Posts
    3,468
    LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future LordLink has a brilliant future
    78

    Mine have only ever run once. Sitting in a building with a 3+ cover save. Got shot by a pair of lascannons. Both hit, both wound I fail both saves rangers run, fail to rally, flee the board. Slightly annoying but it was extremely unlucky. Rangers don't suck becaue of that one situation.
    Check out my Codex: Farmyard Animals here!

    If anyone wants any kind of help writing fluff for any kind of GW army just ask.

    Fluffmaster
    Anzac Clan

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Pathfinder sheatfish.
    By Shas'O RenoSaurus in forum Tau Empire
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: August 14th, 2005, 14:06
  2. pathfinder withOUT devilfish
    By suzaraki in forum Tau Empire
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: April 22nd, 2005, 01:20
  3. Pathfinder
    By white scar in forum Tau Empire
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: February 15th, 2005, 13:35
  4. Pathfinder Railrifles
    By Kurdt in forum Tau Empire
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 1st, 1970, 01:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Warhammer-Toplist Warvault Webring


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.0 RC1 PL1