Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
someone may have pointed this out all ready but i noticed a few things in the witch hunters codex that didnt seem right,
first and more importantly, the witch hunters codex summary says that heavy flamers are assualt, but the daemonhunters summary says that they are heavy (please excuse this newbish question, but i just started 40k recently. youd think the word "heavy" would clear it up for me, but im just making sure).
also inquisitor karamazov has a gun servitor in his "retinue" wouldnt that give him a extra weaponskill because its a warrior?
these questions are pretty irrelevant but i was just wondering. thanks!
The Daemonhunters book is wrong about the Heavy Flamer, it's assault not heavy. The DH FAQ addressed that.
As for Karamazov, I'm pretty sure he is played with the profile he comes with; everything is reflected in it already.
Or so it says.
And it's an execution-servitor not a gun-servitor.
My mistake, the execution-servitor counts as a gun servitor[/edit]
And over there we have the labyrinth guards.
One always lies, one always tells the truth, and one stabs people who ask tricky questions.
i think that about karamazov's ws they say that everything granted by the servitors is already in his profile, and yes cbrate is right he's not a gun servitor so he wont grant him the extra ws
Yep, Karamazov is exactly as he appears on the profile, the only thing they forgot to add to the stats line is the invulnerable save he gets from the rosarius.
I assume discrepancies in points values between codices are not mistakes. I can't remember any, but I know it varies between Hunters and Marines.