A Hand To Hand Gaurd Army( New Codex) - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Jacksonville FL
    Posts
    217
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    PLease do not flame me or call this a stupid idea because its not my idea. It is a friends idea but he doesn't want to register for the forums. HE wants to field a large Infantry force of Guard mainly pumped up for hand to hand and close range shooting. He says he is doing it as a theme for his army and has fluff made up for it. IS he completely mad or do you think he could pull it off and have a semi effective hand to hand/close range shooting guard army. I believe he will rely on outnumbering his opponents in hand to hand at all times by keeping his infantry units close together at all times and fielding a 50 man conscript unit. HE also would feild 3 6 man units of ogryns in chimeras.

    The doctrines he planned on using are: Close Order Drill, Hardened Fighters, Iron Discipline, conscripts(maybe carapace amor instead), and Ogryns.


  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    LO Zealot
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    western MA, USA
    Posts
    1,164
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x3)

    i dont think he is mad...he should put his squads about 4 " away from each toher tho so if u lose ombat they enemy is foprced to sweep and thatrmeans u can shoo the ***** out of them. he should still have the basilisk and lemun russ tho, just for fire support. i think if done rihgt it can be effective.
    <insert witty remark here>

  4. #3
    Ino
    Ino is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Wilmington, Delaware, USA
    Posts
    97
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Sounds like an awesome idea... though I don&#39;t know if it would work out right

    I kind of took my army (Death Korps) along a HtH style, it&#39;s good to hear that more guard players don&#39;t bother to play their army the way it was meant to be played. I heard rumors of warrior weapons guard (don&#39;t know if it is true) but it was supposed to give them all pistol + ccw. If that was the case, you could make a butt kicking guard army out of a bunch of guys with that doctrine.

    Mostly, for my army, I weigh down the enemy by numbers in close combat, and outfit all my officers with power weapons/fists to really make them do some damage. My thinking on power fists was always: I strike last in hand to hand combat anyway, might as well kill a few people if I&#39;m still standing&#33;

    Tell your friend he&#39;s not completely crazy (in my mind), I think it sounds like a great idea. I was just thinking about a tallarn kind of fremen guard army, not that I would make one.
    The Good News is here&#33;

    Check it out:
    <a href='http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?language=english&passage=Ezekiel+18%3A28-32&version=NIV' target='_blank'>Ezekiel 18:28-32</a>
    <a href='http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?language=english&version=NIV&passage=Ezekiel+33%3A11' target='_blank'>Ezekiel 33:11</a>
    <a href='http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?language=english&version=NIV&passage=Mark+1%3A15' target='_blank'>Mark 1:15</a>
    <a href='http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?language=english&version=NIV&passage=Romans+10%3A9-10' target='_blank'>Romans 10:9-10</a>

    PM me for more info&#33;

  5. #4
    Senior Member Moncs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    346
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    you could go two units of conscripts with warrior weapons ( 4 doctrine points ) and unit of ten ogryns ( 30 wounds, 30 S6 attacks on the charge )

    This is what I&#39;ve been thinking of doing, however I realy want to include engineseers

  6. #5
    Son of LO H0urg1ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    171 (x6)

    I just don&#39;t understand people who go buy an IG army and then the first thing they try to do with it is get in to HtH.
    Hey, when your friend gets tired of getting his butt mopped up after attempting to HtH anything resembling Space Marines, Eldar, Dark Eldar, Tyranids, Orks and Necrons, ask him if he&#39;ll sell his army to me. (That only leaves other guard armies and Tau...)
    If he still insists on this course of action at least tell him to fill ALL his elites slots with as many Ogryn as the new codex allows and attach a tooled up Commissar to each unit. Only then can I see guard doing well in HtH.
    I have the highest win record at my store out of 20 people with my IG army and it sure as heck isn&#39;t from getting into HtH with them.

  7. #6
    LO Zealot
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    western MA, USA
    Posts
    1,164
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x3)

    wat do u doto win so much then?
    <insert witty remark here>

  8. #7
    Son of LO H0urg1ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    171 (x6)

    Balance is the key, you can&#39;t have too much of any one thing for IG to work well.

    1) You need no more than one tank for every 500 points for starters and the first tank that every IG army should have is a Basilisk the second should be a leman russ and the third tank, if you play 1500 and up armies, should either be a Demolisher or Exterminator (Yes you can still use it).
    2) If you have a group of soldiers on the table, other than Ogryn, then they need a heavy weapon and their full compliment of assault weapons. period.
    Your command squad is only their to keep the rest of your squads from running away.
    3) Don&#39;t waste points on tooling up your colonel; just take him, a comm link and a banner and sit behind your troops providing morale and an extra heavy weapon.

    I have other points that I would make, but the new IG dex may override those points so I&#39;ll save them until I read it. But these are the basics and should be followed no matter what.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bligh Park Sydney Australia
    Posts
    60
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Personally i don&#39;t see the use of a Close Combat guard army. The guard are a shooty army that pummel others into submition with laserlights (lasguns) and artillery. Then if the odds are in their favor or the enemy has taken heavy casualties they will use close combat to destroy them.

    Sure the new rules allow for improved Close Combat but i find that it defeats the purpose of collecting a guard army. If you want close combat go orks or nids. The guard are for shooting.

  10. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    he should put his squads about 4 " away from each toher tho so if u lose ombat they enemy is foprced to sweep and thatrmeans u can shoo the ***** out of them.
    Hey, can so explain that to me ?
    I&#39;ve already heard of the 4" distance between troops, but I don&#39;t understand why the enemy is forced to sweep and not assault you.

    Thanks for lighting my torch.

    Kryss

  11. #10
    Son of LO H0urg1ass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    171 (x6)

    Ummm, there is no more sweeping advance now. The enemy only gets to consolidate 3" after winning in CC. This means that if you keep all of your squads more than 4" apart, then soldiers with normal sized bases will not be able to get into close combat again. This means you can shoot the crap out of whatever just won in CC.

    I personally put the front row of my guardsmen about 6 1/2" away from the back row. I don&#39;t worry about the 4" rule past the first row, cause if they survive your turn of free shooting at them, then it&#39;s kinda too late for you by then.

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts