Basilisk and indirect fire - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Member Korim Trucebane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    4 (x1)

    Basilisk and indirect fire

    everything about the basilisk model says it's designed to fire indirectly, and I've never seen anyone field it without buying the indirect fire option... so why do we have to pay to use the tank in the way that it was designed to be used? why not just make it a special feature of the basilisk and be done with it?... or am I completely out of line?


  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Member Anticitizen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    242
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Becuse rolling 2 dice is lame....And What if your shooting into a mob directly, you dont want the shot to scatter away from the targeted units,Also Alot of ppl already complain about the basi The ppl at GW have to make it fair for other players....

  4. #3
    Senior Member JORMAGI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Age
    39
    Posts
    886
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputation
    50 (x2)

    Hmm I'm thinking the question is why is indirect fire an upgrade. He's suggesting that it should cost the base X points, and have indirect be a feature for the tank, not an upgrade.

    Honestly it would make more sense, but I don't mind it the way it is. The upgrade is easy enough to ALWAYS take.
    Votewar MKV 2nd place. . .

    Back from internet limbo, and glad to be here.

  5. #4
    Senior Member Microcosm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Germany
    Age
    31
    Posts
    344
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    20 (x1)

    just use tippex on the basic point value and rewrite it +the extra points for indirect shooting :w00t:

  6. #5
    Member RaiderOne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Age
    32
    Posts
    148
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    9 (x1)

    Indirect fire is an upgrade because it makes the tank impossible to destroy without serious movment of anti tank firepower.

    Indirect Advantage
    - Hard to destroy
    - Do not need to see the enemy to fire

    Direct Advantage
    - Cheaper then indirect
    - Scatters less

    This is partialy offset by the fact that indirect fire has a minimum range of 36" (3ft). Still the advantage of bombing your enemy with Str 9 Ap 3 artillery with no chance of loss yourself is a big advantage for a tank with only 12 front armour. The option is left in because not everyone wants to use indirect fire, when theres 2 Russes and a Basi as potential targets and you have the means to destroy one will you pick the Bas over a Russ? probebly not.
    The man of tomorrow is judged by his battle today.

  7. #6
    Member Elric101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    195
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    4 (x1)

    But the extra D6 for indirect fire scatter is barely anything. I used to think you add the two together but purchase of the rulebook proved that theorem wrong.

    So called 'Guess weapons' in 3rd edition were a lot worse off than nowadays (unless you were really good at estimating distances).

    But upgrade or an add-on to the points cost from the start. It just allows the guard to be that tiny bit more flexible. But the option for an upgrade for indirect fire or having it from the start doesn't make a huge differnce to gameplay, and besides we're IG players, what are we complaining about.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts