Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
here is my 1700pt list i need to know which tank ace you guys would take to finish it off
3 demolishers with 3 hbs, extra armor, rugged terrian mod, ace gunner
3 leman russes, with 3 hbs, extra amor, rugged t mod, ace gunner
1 command tank, exterminator, h stubber, 3 hbs, rugged t , extra armor, ace gunner
my last tank can either be a tank ace vanquisher with 3 hbs, extra amor, and rugged t, ace gunner
(in which case i need to find 12 pts to shave, probably the h stubber from the command tank)
tank ace exterminator with h stubber, 3 hbs, extra amor, rugged t mod, ace gunner
(in this case i get to spend an aditional 43pts, thinking of buying every tank smoke launchers and search lights...)
Which would you pick?
I would probably go with the vanquisher since all the ordnance and heavy bolters should be sufficient anti-infantry. Also, even with ace gunners, blast ordnance isn't the most reliable tank killer.
*Just so you know, you called the exterminator (twin autocannons) an executioner (big plasma cannon) in your title.*
Last edited by qsd; November 28th, 2007 at 02:57.
There is no such thing as a plea for innocence in my court. A plea for innocence is guilty of wasting my time. Guilty.
- Inquisitor Lord Fyodor Karamazov
I must say i agree with qsd on taking the vanqisher over the executioner.
Even though it is more expensive, the pts should be worth sacrificing the h-stubber.
But also with the vanquisher you have a much more effective anti-tank tank, and also making good use of your BS 4 with it being a command tank, making it more likely to destroy enemy armour. So yes i would also go for the vanquisher.