Welcome to Librarium Online!
what do you thinks better for a oldblood + 3 strength or + 3 attacks
Last edited by psychosheep; August 2nd, 2010 at 20:54.
i mean strength not stregth sorry
It really depends on other factors, like what unit he is in, does he have a mount, etc. Without these things, my first instinct would be for +3 attacks.
I am right 94% of the time, why worry about the other 3%.
+3 attacks would be better in my opinion
Or...sword of anti-heroes and run smack dab into the unit with the all-but-guaranteed BSB + mage (or other hero) +- general and get the best of both worlds? Much more situational but I'm finding these types of units all over the place.
I personally would rather have a bunch of medium strength attacks then a few high strength ones.
I think if you're going for strength you might as well take a great weapon and spend the points your saving on some impressive magical armour/ward save.
+3 attacks for that many points makes more sense to me.
I wouldn't spend the points past +2 strength. 7 strength and 8 strength are going to be giving you the very same rolls to wound and will pierce most armor either way. +3 attacks seems like the way to go if you are gonna spend all the points for it. Heroslayer looks fun though!
well it was for a carnosaur mounted oldblood with enchanted shield and the carnosaur pendent
thanks for the help i think am going to attack spam 9 s 5 attacks plus the carnosaurs is going to be pritty brutal