Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
I was wandering if using dwarfs instead of gnoblers(relatively thunders) a good option as I prefer the models and can write up a fluff eventually.
Last edited by ArchonFarseerGuy; February 18th, 2009 at 04:57. Reason: Capitals man, capitals!
Could you please use proper grammar in your posts? In this specific one, I refer to use of capital letters, and complete sentences (rather, a lack thereof).
To your question, it depends on your opponent. Some people will have no problems whatsoever with it, but others will give you a hard time about WYSIWYG rules. It may be wise to ask around before making any definitive decisions.
If they were heavily converted I would not mind.
Daemonic cheese-how? Well, you would need to start with daemonic milk, i guess...
i was thinking that the dwarfs were being used as slave but anyway ill just get the gnoblers to be on the safe side
If I were at a tournament and you showed up with a bunch of well-converted (no armor!) dwarven slaves counting them as Gnoblars, I would give you a maxed out army appearance score.