Imperial 1000pt Fleet - considering two options - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    47
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Imperial 1000pt Fleet - considering two options

    So, I'm quite new to BFG, and I'm gonna be playing this weekend. Looking things over and reviewing various tactica, I've come up with two lists:

    Fleet Admiral
    Overlord BC with Turret Upgrade
    Dictator CC
    Lunar CC
    Dauntless LC (Torpedo)
    3x Sword FF
    3x Cobra FF

    or, the BB version:

    Fleet Admiral w/ 1 extra reroll
    Retribution BB
    Dictator CC
    2x Dauntless LC (Torpedo)
    4x Sword FF

    The first one, I would run all 4 capitals as one squadron, screen them with the Swords, and sent the Cobras out as a wolf pack.

    The second one, I still put the capitals as one squadron, but now I'm unsure if I'd run one screen of 4x swords or 2 of 2xSwords.

    And I'm a bit concerned about the fleet admiral... nearly every list I've seen posted on the internet uses him - but is Ld8 enough when you need to reload ordnance? This squadron puts out 24/27 str Torpedo salvo, granted I have to close for it to be effective, but don't you want a better chance for the 2nd (or 3rd) shot? Just asking... I went with the ld 8 because that seemed to be the overwhelming norm.

    So thoughts? Which one is better? Or do they both blow?

    Thanks.


  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Member cadia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    stoke on trent
    Age
    26
    Posts
    106
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    6 (x1)

    been getting back into gothic myself recently as my local club has gained a few new players,

    first off admiral of some sort is needed in games over 750 points,
    ld 8 is a nice leadership for a ship, best imerial can get i think is 9 anyway so no great loss, for special orders i believe in squadrens you use highest leadership value for it, so the adiral gives you a nice stable value as the other ships leadership values are random. in smaller games such as 1000points leadership 8 is good, its not until large games that lower eaderships are going to make alot of difference or in my experience anyway.

    i will say this i played agame about 3 hours ago well we finished about 3 hours ago started about 5 or 6 hours ago, i won because of the BC it was 2 points above being cripled but it managed to wipe out over half the oposing fleet on its own, though it was ignored for most of the game so i got off lucky there,

    hope it helps you sightly

    Cadia

  4. #3
    I was very, VERY drunk. thechaplain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lincolnshire
    Posts
    612
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    136 (x3)

    For the size of game you're playing, your first list would probably be a better option. In smaller games, two cruisers will carry a lot more weight than a single battleship - at that level, your battleship would just be isolated and torn to shreds.

    In the interest of balance, I'd suggest dropping the Lunar for a Gothic - that would give you some reasonable lance power for the same cost, as at the moment your fleet is very gun-heavy. Other than that it's a decent fleet!

    As for the Admiral, Ld. 8 is usually enough in smaller games - you'll find that leadership in BFG is really quite random anyway - lots of things can modify it. So bearing in mind that things will be sending your leadership up and down for the duration of the game, 8 is a solid base - to either make you very effective at passing ld tests when things go your way, or keep you reasonably effective when they don't. Add to that the fact that he's cheap and you're on to a winner - below 2000 points, extra ships will serve you better than extra leadership.

  5. #4
    Benevolent Dictator CaptainSarathai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    inside your head
    Posts
    9,221
    Mentioned
    77 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    1480 (x8)

    I rarely ever field battleships. There have been discussions about "degradation", wherein a Battleship will suffer repeated criticals, lose effective batteries and manueverability, ld, etc. For the points, you're better off with a squadron of cruisers, because the damage will be spread out over the squadron, and taking 6 hits means the full loss of a single ship out of 3, rather than the crippling of the only vessel (this cuts off dead weight, better to die than to drag the others down).

    I agree to stick with the Admiral, Ld8 is fine for the reloading. I find that I only really reload once. 1 volley to break them up, reload. Then my ships deliver point-blank salvos later in the game. As they are a squadron, I usually don't reload until they ALL need reloading.

    I'd also lose the Dauntless and Swords for a large squadron of Cobras. Torpedoes have a higher effective range, and bypass shields.
    Pts Values for AoS here!

    Nippon Armybook: Isuu, Scribd, and free at Google Docs

  6. #5
    Member horizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    38
    Posts
    347
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    110 (x2)

    Heya,

    don't run all 4 capital ships/cruisers in a squadron. You don't want
    to have a Lunar on Reload Ordnance when it should Lock On, you won't
    want a Dictator on Lock On when you need to reload ordnance. Get it?

    Also: if you need to brace: all ships in the squadron are braced.

    I would only squadron 2 Lunars or Lunar/Armageddon (in BFA) within
    an IN fleet above 1000pts! Otherwise always split.

    Fleet Admiral is perfect. Enemies will be on special orders a lot of time so you gain a +1 easy.

    I rarely ever field battleships. There have been discussions about "degradation", wherein a Battleship will suffer repeated criticals, lose effective batteries and manueverability, ld, etc. For the points, you're better off with a squadron of cruisers, because the damage will be spread out over the squadron, and taking 6 hits means the full loss of a single ship out of 3, rather than the crippling of the only vessel (this cuts off dead weight, better to die than to drag the others down).
    Untrue on all accounts. What do you mean with 'repeated criticals' anyway. An Emperor battleship is a fearsome ship and the best carrier the IN has. Above 1200pts pretty good.

    Damage will not spread in a squadron! First ship gets all hits. (You cannot target specific ships within a squadron, nearest is hit).

    On your lists: I don't like both. What daft tactica advised you take an Overlord or Retribution is such low points? Single Dauntless isn't good either. You company it with either another Dauntless or a Firestorm squadron.

    Fleet Admiral
    Dictator
    Dominator
    Gothic
    Lunar (or second Gothic maybe even better)
    3x Cobra
    3x Cobra

    or look at the vengeance / excorcist options
    WARP RIFT - The Battlefleet Gothic Online Fanzine
    Download it here:
    http://www.epic40k.co.uk/bfgmag/index.html

  7. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    47
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Thanks for all the advice!

    Quote Originally Posted by thechaplain View Post
    In the interest of balance, I'd suggest dropping the Lunar for a Gothic - that would give you some reasonable lance power for the same cost, as at the moment your fleet is very gun-heavy. Other than that it's a decent fleet!
    That makes sense, thanks!

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainSaratha View Post
    I'd also lose the Dauntless and Swords for a large squadron of Cobras. Torpedoes have a higher effective range, and bypass shields.
    True, but the intent of the swords was to be a screening element for the squadron of captials - to fend off ordnance and pesky eldar raiders

    Quote Originally Posted by horizon View Post
    don't run all 4 capital ships/cruisers in a squadron. You don't want
    to have a Lunar on Reload Ordnance when it should Lock On, you won't
    want a Dictator on Lock On when you need to reload ordnance. Get it?

    Also: if you need to brace: all ships in the squadron are braced.
    This makes sense - I can see the downsides. On the other hand, I see the upside of combining weapon/torpedo salvos into one bigger shot.

    I'll have to think about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by horizon View Post
    Fleet Admiral is perfect. Enemies will be on special orders a lot of time so you gain a +1 easy.
    This seems to be the consensus, so it's a done deal.

    Quote Originally Posted by horizon View Post
    On your lists: I don't like both. What daft tactica advised you take an Overlord or Retribution is such low points? Single Dauntless isn't good either. You company it with either another Dauntless or a Firestorm squadron.
    Can't remember which tactica - perhaps none. i was looking at them due to 60cm range. All the rest of the ships have 30cm _except_ for the Dominator, which has a 30cm minimum range. Not too fond of that (although I appreciate the Nova cannon is excellent).

    I also have a "vision", I suppose you could say. While I certainly like/want to win, I also like my lists (in 40k, that is) to have some - theme, I suppose. So I had this image of some flagship (Retribution or Overlord), slightly larger than the rest of the ships, the centerpiece of the fleet. Then the supporting vessels around it.

    And I agree that a Dauntless on its own isn't a swell idea - but then my initial premise was that the capitals were in a squadron.

    Quote Originally Posted by horizon View Post
    Fleet Admiral
    Dictator
    Dominator
    Gothic
    Lunar (or second Gothic maybe even better)
    3x Cobra
    3x Cobra

    or look at the vengeance / excorcist options
    Not a fan of the Vengence/Exorcists - which I suppose is arrogant of me, since I have very little play experience. But the lack of 6+ prow, no torpedos, and no front facing weapons are a bit of a turn-off for me.

    Thanks for the list - you make some very valid points, and I certainly have less experience than those on this list, so I'll take everyone's ideas/comments under advisement.

    Andy
    Last edited by AAkins; June 12th, 2009 at 15:06.

  8. #7
    I was very, VERY drunk. thechaplain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lincolnshire
    Posts
    612
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    136 (x3)

    Quote Originally Posted by AAkins View Post
    I also have a "vision", I suppose you could say. While I certainly like/want to win, I also like my lists (in 40k, that is) to have some - theme, I suppose. So I had this image of some flagship (Retribution or Overlord), slightly larger than the rest of the ships, the centerpiece of the fleet. Then the supporting vessels around it.
    You know, I've been playing BFG for a while now - and I do exactly the same thing. The way I see it, I'd rather lose with something that looked like a cohesive and realistic fleet than win with something that looks precisely tailored to defeat whatever's coming at me! That's the only reason I use a Mechanicus Ark - I love the way the ship looks and it fits nicely with the fluff of my fleet, which in turn fits nicely with the fluff of my 40k Guard army. I've lost a couple of games for it, but I wouldn't change it for a couple of wins.

    I suppose there is an argument to be had for starting off with optimal lists, so as to get the basics and a few good tactics under your belt, which is what I did, but I also seem to recall havng to re-learn everything when I started using a primarily fluff fleet! In short, it's your game - and I mean BFG as a whole, not just the battle that this list is for. So if you get more enjoyment from using a centerpiece, go for it! You may have to be prepared to see it take the occasional kicking - I don't know about you, but I quite enjoy commanding a fleet that isn't invincible and will win or lose based on how well I use them during the game - not on paper before anything's even kicked off!

    Finally, on a personal note, I hope you'll keep posting in the BFG forums - it'll be nice to have more people about who can appreciate a good kicking in the name of fluff!


    All that said, if you did want to give yourself one tiny advantage, I'd like to retract my suggestion about the Gothic - I thought you might be fighting Eldar based on your setup, but I couldn't be sure! As you are, you have totally the right idea - cruisers and guns!

  9. #8
    Member horizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Age
    38
    Posts
    347
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    110 (x2)

    Heya,

    first of all: All my fleets are fluff build. All my admirals have a long or very long background story in one way or another.

    With my Eldar I even take the Spirit of Arina (Flame of Asuryan) with Hero for at least 470 pts in a 1250pts Craftworld or Corsair fleet. Because it is my ship. And it's a game winner! Always good dice. Yay.

    But if someone on a forum asks advice I'll give him the best suggestions. Logical I think.

    On squadroning: weapon batteries together has merits because of intervening blastmarkers, lances have no benefit.
    Therefor it is logical to squadron two Lunars but not a Dominator and Gothic. Both variants have same firepower (12 wb + 4 lances as a broadside). But in the last case, without squadroning it is easier to manoeuvre. Gothic can go abeam and lock on, Dominator turn to gain better approach.

    I rather field 12wb @ 30cm then 8wb @ 60cm from an Overlord.
    WARP RIFT - The Battlefleet Gothic Online Fanzine
    Download it here:
    http://www.epic40k.co.uk/bfgmag/index.html

  10. #9
    Member Hockeyman506's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,648
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    184 (x5)

    Exorcists are nice if you want to trade the torpedos and front armor for a bit more survivability and firepower over the Dictator.

    After playing several games as IN, I've kinda come to dislike the Dictator. Don't really know why, just doesn't seem to be as effective for it point value. Not that it isn't a good ship at all, just that at 220 points it seems a bit, blarg. Same goes for the Overlord in my opinion. Now the Mars I like a lot better as a carrier granted it is a pretty hefty price at 1k, then again it can also be the nice fluffy ship.

    Cobra's are very nice, I try to field groups of at least 4 if possible. They can seriously maul anything that doesn't Brace, even then you cost the opponent probably a few hits and no special orders next turn.

    A Lunar and a Gothic work wonders in conjuction with each other. Almost every capitol ship kill I've gotten have come from Gothics chewing apart the enemy after the Lunars guns drop the shields.

    The ships you posted with the longer range gun batteries would be useful against Eldar, but not so much with anything else as you need the support of the 30 cm range ships to really lay down the hurt.

    This is all opinion of course. Play around by proxying or magnetize every type of weapon you have to swap things out as well (can also be used to show criticals be removing armaments). See what you like and roll with it.

  11. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Age
    47
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    So... a noob question. At 1000 points, how important is strike craft?

    The Dictator seems a bit pricy, but is the only way (short of several lt cruisers, or a mars, or an exorcist) to get strike craft.

    You ditch in, and you can do things like

    Fleet Admiral
    Gothic
    Lunar
    Gothic
    Lunar
    Vengeance

    or

    Fleet Admiral
    Dominator
    Lunar
    Gothic
    Lunar
    Dauntless
    Dauntless

    or

    Fleet Admiral
    Lunar
    Gothic
    Cobra x6
    Lunar
    Vengeance

    Of course, any where above you could replace the Vengeance with an exorcist, I suppose...

    But I guess what I'm asking is, in 1000 pts, how big of a deal is 4 squadrons of strike craft? Is it nice, or is it an necessity?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts