Welcome to Librarium Online!
Has anyone tried this; rather than buying a ganger at its set statline for 50 creds, how about buying a juve for the same but roll 3 advances?
This would allow for more realistic gangers with a bit more depth.
I'd personally not allow it - unless you rolled a random injury for them too. The whole point is gangers are your solid dependable types (as dependable as you can get with BS3), juves are the wildcards you HOPE will get good before they get crippled.
when ever i make a new gang i always roll for one new advance for each member except juves, since technically at the begining when you roll exp they should get one even tho the FAQ's and stuff say they shouldn't i think it adds a more unique feel to each gang.
Nope, never had, but sounds a good idea for 1 off battles.
Last edited by kevin vanrooyen; December 19th, 2009 at 20:42.
IG Best Gen 1st overall of 10 DE 4th overall of 6
Eldar 3rd Overall/Best General of 26--2nd Overall/Best General of 7--1st Overall/Best General of 11
not nessesarily Talisman, i think they took that into account when they made the rules. My look on it is that Juves are, above all, a gamble and the extra advance is to just help make sure that they get decently stats by the time they acheive the status of ganger. From a fluff pov, you could say that they need to prove themselves more than the guy who's been in fights before and is selling himself out to a gang permanently. And from a yet different perspective, I actually tried this on a short campaign with a friend, and the fact my Delaque gang was getting stealth and shooting skills but not many BS advances really hurt and really didnt make up for the lack of a good shooter besides the leader.