Starfox Adventures. - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    london
    Posts
    464
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    Most games magazines didn't rate SA too highly (NGC only gave it 72%), but I have noticed many of us here have it and I was wondering what rating you would have given it.

    Personally, I would have given it 84%, my only negative remarks being that it was too easy and too short, otherwise perfect.

    Apathy is the greatest enemy of all.

    =0_o=

  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Pathfinder Edicius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    under your bed
    Age
    33
    Posts
    2,222
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputation
    54 (x5)

    It was ok..it kinda upset me a little..starfox was only originaly cool because of the cool starships and tanks and stuff..if you take all that away..or turn into just a side feature..you get an anthro fox with a stick..which..( no offense to Toastee)..just isn't that cool

  4. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x0)

    it should have definately got around 80-90%.NGC is rubbish
    FeEd ThE gReAt DeVoUrEr

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    london
    Posts
    464
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    That may be your opinion, Wraith. However, give your reasoning, and don't just shout out insults. Anyway, you cannot base your opinion of the mag on one review.
    Apathy is the greatest enemy of all.

    =0_o=

  6. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    I thought I was quite good 85-93%. It took a bit time for it to get good, at the start its quite crap. The new starfox thats coming out (i think this year) looks really good.
    <img src='http://web.onetel.net.uk/~liewald/sc.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

    <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='font-family:Arial'>This Day we Fight&#33;</span></span>

  7. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    bournemouth, england
    Posts
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    i thought it was good maybe 80% but i don&#39;t thouhgt it was a little to short and doesn&#39;t have much replay value. btu a great game. can&#39;t wait for the new starfox
    game.

  8. #7
    DING chemicalcaveman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Ireland
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,740
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    242 (x6)

    IMO good but not great. The combat was just bashing the same button over and over again, and has no real replay value. Apart from that the graphics and sound was great and i really enjoyed the space ship levels.

  9. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Somewhere (over the rainbow!)
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    84% is what NOM UK gave it&#33; The graphics are cool and the spaceship sections are good (but rubbish compared to Lylat Wars I&#39;m arfaird) The gameplay is cool, and the game isn&#39;t too short. A bit low on vartiry here and there. People are only harsh cos Rare left Ninty (idiots&#33
    Never drink more than 2 Pan-Galactic Gargle Blasters unless you are a thirty-ton Mega Elephant with brocal pheomonia&#33;

  10. #9
    Son of Dorn Sanctus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Springfield, Mo
    Age
    31
    Posts
    949
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    20 (x2)

    It was repetitive, easy, boring, mindnumbingly easy fighting, looked like it was made for some one of 9 or 10, incredably short, no really hard puzzles, and it had way to few flying levels. Other than that it was decent. I would give it a 75%. I was expecting something more along the lines of StarFox 64 and I thought they could have done a better job if they wanted to go Zelda style.
    <(^^)> <(^^<) (>^^)> ^(^^)^ Dance Kirby! Dance!

  11. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Somewhere (over the rainbow!)
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    I agree that the combat was rubbish, it should be like zelda&#39;s. THey should have used up dated Lylat Wars (Starfox 64) levels&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;
    Never drink more than 2 Pan-Galactic Gargle Blasters unless you are a thirty-ton Mega Elephant with brocal pheomonia&#33;

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts