Firewarrior - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Firewarrior

  1. #1
    Consumate professional Sir Theobold the Lame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Chester uk
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    280 (x8)

    Who likes Firewarrior? i think its great altho a bit easy, but ive read a lot of bad reviews- thought t might be interesting to hear the views of GW players?

    PLAN CLAN MAN!!

    He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man- S. Johnson

  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member The Incubi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Toronto,Canada
    Posts
    589
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x2)

    I think this should be on a different board ..
    "There is no middle ground. Strike Hard, strike fast and strike first."

  4. #3
    ork
    ork is offline
    Member ork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    upton
    Posts
    46
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    fire warrer is a great game but i think that theay could mack it batter by allawing you to choose whot army you want to be.

    allso the weppons are to pawerfull
    <img src='http://www.sun.ee/Warhammer/Orks.gif' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

    f*****g proper job&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

    orks rule&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;




    THIS IS A GOOD PASS TIME.

  5. #4
    Consumate professional Sir Theobold the Lame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Chester uk
    Age
    36
    Posts
    2,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    280 (x8)

    incubi- why should it be on a different board? im talki9ng bout the ps2 version...
    PLAN CLAN MAN!!

    He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man- S. Johnson

  6. #5
    Senior Member Zora Blade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Valencia, CA
    Age
    36
    Posts
    535
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputation
    41 (x2)

    I have the PC and PS2 version... the PS2 version is better... it&#39;s a realy good console game ^_^ reminds me a lot of halo... as for the PC *sigh* why oh why... the multiplayer sucks, the graphix are lame for a PC game of the time period... game play is alright but I&#39;d rather play unreal 2004 or Battle feild 1942. all and all PS2 vesrsion GOOD&#33;&#33; ^_^.. PC version BAD&#33;&#33;

    -Jenn

    Come to think of it... I&#39;d rather play SWG (starwars galaxies)on the PC then play firewarrior... and thats an understatement

    Current Armys
    Tomb Kings, Marines, Eldar

  7. #6
    Senior Member Donny B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Sackets Harbor, NY
    Posts
    289
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    there was no challange to it. as discussed on an old post: most of the weapons were too slow to use, and never did enough damage. a plasma pistol that takes 7-8 seconds to fire the two shots in order to kill one marine&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;

  8. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Reputation
    1 (x1)

    IT sucks and that just it


    SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK SUCK
    --------------------------


  9. #8
    Sorcerer Spike_alike's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    England, Northamptonshire
    Age
    26
    Posts
    1,532
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    6 (x4)

    I thought it was pretty cool. Just a standard FPS given a 40k theme. Not so bad when playing against your mates.
    A Promise to a dead man means nothing.

  10. #9
    Senior Member slicer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Across the void of the empty intergalatic gulf aka North East, UK
    Posts
    838
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    -4 (x0)

    I thought it was pretty good, what I thought was weird was the massive gap between the overpowered weapons and the extremely poor weapons, also the bolter was sooo much better than the pulse rifle yet in game terms a pulse rifle is far superior... but I suppose its the game term that could be wrong...
    <img src='http://muchos.co.uk/members/slicer/sig_slicer2.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

  11. #10
    Senior Member Ultramarines r cool's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    599
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    4 (x2)

    I think it was OK but then again if you compare it to DoW then it really, really sucks bad.


    Supporter in the Eternal War Against.......Nothing!

    Ratlings>C'Tan

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts