Imperial Guard Leman Russ Exterminator B - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Armored Cav Addict Zeewulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minnesoooooota
    Posts
    993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    208 (x4)

    Imperial Guard Leman Russ Exterminator B

    With the loss of str 5 weapons being considered defensive, the heavy bolter sponsons on a Leman Russ, in particular an Exterminator can no longer make it that rolling infantry devourer that it used to be. Instead, we can either sit and get to fire all the guns (aside from when Ordinance fires), or move, and maybe shoot the left sponson at something random.

    Because of this, I was thinking "I really wanted to get an exterminator for anti-infantry goodness..but now it's no longer as awesome in a mobile role." How on earth would I manage to get that, without it becoming insanely overpowered, yet keeping some good battlefield mobility?

    And then it hit me. The Exterminator B.



    Leman Russ Exterminator B

    120 Points
    WS: 3 | FA: 14 | SA: 12 | RA:10|
    Main Armament: Twin Linked Autocannon
    You must choose for the hull-mount position: Heavy Bolter (+5 Points) OR Twin-Linked Heavy Stubber (+10 Points) OR Lascannon (+15 Points)
    You may upgrade to Heavy Stubber or Stormbolter Sponsons for +15 Points


    So, a fully kitted out Exterminator B would cost ~145, plus the cost of a pintle-mount stubber or stormbolter if you really want one.

    What do you all think?

    EDIT: I think it's clearer now.

    Last edited by Zeewulf; July 23rd, 2008 at 17:41. Reason: Clarity

  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    gone fishin' avatar of khaine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,359
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    108 (x4)

    eh? what?

    Please make this easier to understand, post it in the way it would appear in the guard codex.

    As it is, i really don't think the guard need more Russ variants.
    Avatar's Arena #3 let the games begin!
    The Outsider And Kae'Tyr-necron fluff

  4. #3
    Armored Cav Addict Zeewulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minnesoooooota
    Posts
    993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    208 (x4)

    Sorry! I was in a bit of a hurry, to be honest! I had to get out the door quick and didn't want to lose the train of thought before it was too late!
    I'll edit the original post!

  5. #4
    gone fishin' avatar of khaine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,359
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    108 (x4)

    why is a twinlinked stubber more expensive than a heavy bolter?
    Avatar's Arena #3 let the games begin!
    The Outsider And Kae'Tyr-necron fluff

  6. #5
    Armored Cav Addict Zeewulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minnesoooooota
    Posts
    993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    208 (x4)

    Never really made anything like this before, to be honest. I figure its better to over-cost things than to undercost, until its all hammered out. But it would make more sense to swap the two costs, wouldn't it?

    The main reason I was thinking of the higher price, however, was because you can move and fire the twin-linked stubbers alongside the main guns, while you can't do that with a heavy bolter...so, it lends a bit more of an advantage in that regard. At least, that was my original reasonings.

  7. #6
    Senior Member distortiondave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Burnley, UK
    Posts
    951
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    107 (x3)

    The Malcador Defender is the answer - 5 heavy bolters, demolisher cannon plus either 2 more heavy bolters, 2 autocannons or 2 lascannons, all able to fire at different targets whilst moving (albeit slowly).
    Granted, it costs more than twice as much as yours but it is more than twice as effective, but it is for apo games only

    Your logic in increasing the points cost is good, I think. In the old Codex Catachans they had to pay triple whack for flamers because they used them so effecitvely, so having a rolling gun waggon firing off 9 S4 shots (if you take stubber sponsons) with its defensive weapons on top of 2 S7 needs some sort of price increase to accomodate. Otherwise you might as well just run it in its normal design - thats why the stubber needs to be more expensive as it will kill more if used in its intended role as a mobile gun box.
    I can't say I've seen it all but I live for the things that keep me hollow.

  8. #7
    Armored Cav Addict Zeewulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minnesoooooota
    Posts
    993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    208 (x4)

    Well, I was looking through my Imperial Armour Apocalypse book when the idea came to me, courtesy of the Macharious. I honestly hate the design of the Malcador (It is so very ugly), and though it can fire all around, you brought up the most important point: You cannot use it in a normal game. This one would almost be perfect in a normal game. On top of that, it won't be too overpowered simply because of what would happen if you let it roll forward without any sort of ground support element...the moment something assaults it, it will likely die because of the new CC rules against vehicles. You will NEED to support it with an infantry squad or two.

  9. #8
    Lord Admiral kithre's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Iver Heath
    Age
    39
    Posts
    2,608
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    220 (x8)

    I like the idea of having heavy stubbers, and probably a pintle-mounted twin-linked heavy stubber as well, it's basically an anti-infantry tank par-excellence..2 S7 shots (TL) + 12 heavy stubber shots (TL) will cause problems for any infantry unit, including MEQs...

    I agree that Guard don't always require the additional tanks but the Exterminator could be a specialist tank that might be fun to take in the odd battle and certainly encourages a moving battle-line rather than a single "gun line" - all in the best for 5th edition..

  10. #9
    Pedantic Englishman Wolf Lord Herby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Age
    26
    Posts
    1,229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    136 (x4)

    That looks pretty solid, I'd just say make the sponson Stubbers TL-ed.. and maybe up the cost a little? A pintle 'Bolter is 10pts... and a 'pintle stubber 12pts..

    Maybe keep the bolters as is, as they have a much more restricted arc of fire than a pintle-mounted version, and up the stubbers, if TL-ed, to 25pts? around the cost as 2 pintle stubbers, but TL-ed and with reduced arc of fire.
    FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC

  11. #10
    Senior Member Sitnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    358
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    16 (x1)

    Maybe keep the bolters as is, as they have a much more restricted arc of fire than a pintle-mounted version, and up the stubbers, if TL-ed, to 25pts? around the cost as 2 pintle stubbers, but TL-ed and with reduced arc of fire.
    That is a little to much for a TL-Heavy Stubber I don't think Lasccahnons are that much.

    I think +15 for TL Storm Bolters and TL Heavy Stubbers is a good price. The pintle mounted versions may about as much for non-TL versions, but anymore then that and you overpriced a tank with one job: Anti-Infantry. I also think TL is a good idea just because it'll give you more killy power.
    "Dear Diary: Today I may of accidentally registered myself as a sex offender. WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY LIFE!" - Dinosaur Comics

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts