| |||||||
| New! Use your Facebook, Google, AIM & Yahoo accounts to securely log into this site, click logo to login | |
| Space Marines "And they shall know no fear..." |
| View Poll Results: Who suffers the most from the new space marine rules | |||
| Space marine | | 5 | 3.23% |
| DA, BA, BT, DH | | 53 | 34.19% |
| Chaos space marine | | 16 | 10.32% |
| others | | 24 | 15.48% |
| none (The rules are fair) | | 57 | 36.77% |
| Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| | LinkBack (3) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Librarium Online - the forum for all your tabletop gaming needs. Librarium Online offers a wide variety of categories, all from choosing your army to building scenery for gameplay. With over 500 new members every month you can be sure that your questions will be answered. Get help from friendly experts around the world and share your work with us in the gallery or in your personal blog!
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Theres a fine line between a good challenge and imba armies. Armies are not going to be perfectly balanced obviously, but there shouldn't be this unfair emphsasis on teh space marines, just because they are the bestsellers.
|
| |
| | #23 (permalink) |
| Old Maidstonian ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London, UK Age: 26
Posts: 1,578
Blog Entries: 3 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 78 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Where do your ideas about unfair emphasis come from? I mean I know they are the most popular army but why do so many people think that things are tipped in their favour?
__________________ |
| |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| Lord Admiral ![]() Join Date: May 2008 Location: Iver Heath Age: 31
Posts: 2,138
Blog Entries: 2 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 38 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
On an aside referencing LoD not using plasma weapons - it may interest you to know that the LoD were lost in the Warp as the Fire Hawks less than a millenium before the current timeline in 40K - they were involved in the Badab war etc. | |
| |
| | #25 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: St.Helens (england)
Posts: 55
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
i dont think it will be unfair i mean all new things look overpowered until the codex comes out and all flaws and limits are found out. Hisop |
| |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 29 ![]() |
howloutlowd and steel legianaire that is probaly the funniest exchange I have ever read on any forum, anywhere.
__________________ "Militaristic expansion into Hell is a bad idea." - ze_poodle |
| |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Pro at everything ![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 435
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 21 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ive seen the new codex (local store is showing it off) And OMG SM are very powerful from the new codex espcially through the chapter masters the fact that they all have orbital bombardment is horrid but with some of the new vehicles you just bow your head and say "why didnt i go marines" Also with chars such as shrike your entire army gets fleet yes thats right with shrike ur army has fleet, and wen he can infiltrate with a squad of assault marines and assault the enemy first turn it sort of freaks you out with his twin linked rending lightning claws. Either way they are deadly and im considering playing them |
| |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Lord Admiral ![]() Join Date: May 2008 Location: Iver Heath Age: 31
Posts: 2,138
Blog Entries: 2 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 38 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I's also consider using some punctuation in your next post - it doesn't read particularly well. As fr teh new COdex, its the first 5th ed Codex, so no surprise that it's got new toys and nice shiny things for margine players. I can see the new Codices for Crons, Eldar, Tau etc being equally full of nice shiny things and lovely special rules. I do think Orbital bombardment is a bit much, as there is no guarantee of space superiority for a Marine CHapter (unless they bought it perhaps? Maybe having a chapter master on the ground implies that the Battle Barge is in a stationary orbit above the nattlefield?) |
| |
| | #29 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Central California Age: 31
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 74 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
__________________ "Silly man. There was a time the Imperium didn't have your Inquisition. The Imperium had us." -Lord Grimstone of the Night Lords | |
| |
| | #30 (permalink) |
| Master of Those Damn Durable Swords ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Boston Age: 24
Posts: 633
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 58 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm on the fence right now about this whole move toward "Use established chapters. No more DIY Chapters". On the one hand, it'll make gameplay and fluff more streamlined (and get rid of all those "But my chapterz the Shizz. We are from teh lost Primarchz and use all plasma and Eldar technologeez") On the other hand, as a matter of principle, I dislike limiting player creativity and imagination. I especially dislike forcing players to use special characters to make an army unique. Seriously, how many Shrikes or Azraels are out there? It'll look quite ridiculous at tournaments when suddenly you have two DA forces facing each other and both led by Azrael...There was a reason back in 3rd Ed and somewhat in 4th ed, Special Characters required opponents permission to use. Made their appearance rare, and if they did appear, it was for special battles/occasions. As for making SM stronger...I'm not surprised. They're the pilot Army for the new rule book, they're GWs top seller, and of course they're supposed to be really strong. I suspect with all these new "goodies" they get, there will also be a points increase. Probably not a large increase, but an increase nonetheless. With that said, and in regards to some of the confirmed rumors and what not...army bonuses for taking a special character...fine I can dig it. As mentioned I don't like it, but I can deal. As for all chapters or armies or whatnot get Orbital Bombardment, that is just ridiculous. Now if they can purchase it like a Heavy Support choice like the Inquisition, fine that makes sense. But to give it to them for free (which is the implied tone of the previous post), that is just dumb. Plain and simple.
__________________ If you win games against Nids with flamers (aside from the Inferno Cannon on a Hellhound), you're playing against opponents with stupidity of impressive magnitude. ~ Sokhar |
| |
![]() |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.librarium-online.com/forums/space-marines/136260-who-suffers-most-new-space-marine.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Any word on a new BT Codex? - The Bolter and Chainsword : A 40k Space Marine Resource | This thread | Refback | October 5th, 2008 17:22 | |
| Space Marine Terminator Chaplain - Assembling « MiniaturePeddler’s Weblog | This thread | Refback | September 21st, 2008 04:48 | |
| GW Paint Washes are in the house « MiniaturePeddler’s Weblog | This thread | Refback | September 15th, 2008 12:33 | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Space Marine – Competitive – 1850 – “Space Marine Armoured Assault” | thescourgexv88 | Space Marine Army Lists | 5 | October 18th, 2008 11:15 |
| Warhammer 40K Space Marine & Chaos Space Marine Codex | LOC-RSS-BOT | LO Classifieds | 0 | July 1st, 2008 22:40 |
| Warhammer 40K Space Marine & Chaos Space Marine Codex | LOC-RSS-BOT | LO Classifieds | 0 | June 4th, 2008 19:30 |
| Warhammer Epic Space Marine Chaos Space Marine Lot Ptd | LOC-RSS-BOT | LO Classifieds | 0 | May 11th, 2008 13:20 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |