Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
I noticed that the TK lack the option to mount a Tomb King or Prince on a skeletal steed. Although I feel this is a little wierd as it would give our calvary more options. I do like how it forces us to use heroes on foot which compared to my WoC where mounts are almost required is nice change in pace.
If you were given the option to mount a King or Prince would you?
"Thank him who puts me loath to this revenge on you who wrong me not for him who wrongd"
Why put him on a horse when you stick him in a chariot and just mow people down like a huge homicidal lawnmower :-)
It depends on what kind of army I want to play. I would of course at least TRY to mount my King/Prince, just to experience THAT part of TK, but I don't think that I would like the look of it. Chariots are so much cooler
A King on foot, slaying every crypt-hunter with the Destroyer of Eternities, trying to please the blood-hungry blade...
... A King standing in his god-like chariot with golden wheels and a magical spear in his right hand, commanding his legions to urgency with his mind...
... A King mounted on a skeletal steed. <-----------[FAIL]
Ask Nagash! Click on the banner...
WiP TK Army!
i could see a prince on a steed, but not a king. A king has passed the days of single mounts and moved on to the grandeur of Chariots. i mean really... you think Settra would be caught dead (or undead) on a single mount? :-p Personally i think a prince in a group of heavy cav with the speak of antarhak light armor and enchanted shield would be awesome.
Tutumra, Prince of Zandri. Long live the Dead.
I would for fluff reasons, again, probably only a prince, not a king
Fantasy: Wood Elves, Dark Elves, Beastmen and Tomb Kings.
LotR: Misty Mountains and Rohan