BSB vital? - Warhammer 40K Fantasy

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!

Register Now!

User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: BSB vital?

  1. #1
    Son of LO
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    0 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)

    523 (x8)

    BSB vital?

    For a long time now I've considered the BSB the single most important piece of equipment an army can take (with the exception of undead and possibly Ogres)

    Now with the new rules that give it an extra +1 to your CR, I can't see myself ever being tempted to leave home without it

    So as a general discussion, and possibly with reference to the armies that you play, what are your thoughts on the BSB?



  2. Remove Advertisements

  3. #2
    /botnobot/ DavidWC09's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Wayward, Texas
    2 Post(s)
    1 Thread(s)

    1283 (x8)

    If I'm using Eternal Guard and / or a Treeman, the BSB is critical. I don't have other units to backup EG or TM if they run. Seeing either of those units book it means a huge loss of tactical flexibility, not to mention big, big chunks of VPs.

    And you're right, that extra CR is huge. I give my EG the warbanner on the unit standard bearer. Then I give a mundane banner to the BSB along with a spite that makes him really, really hard to hit. It's a beauty of a setup.
    Painting Videos--My Warriors of Chaos--WHFB Tactica Index

  4. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    0 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)

    2 (x1)

    Though I wouldn't say its neccessary, I play Dwarfs so rerolling failed break tests is no big deal, the extra +1 to CR is nice, and the fact that I can spend as much points as I want on runes for it meams it will almost always have a spot in my army.

    My favorite tactic is have a BSB with MRoFear (unit causes fear), RoBattle (another +1 to CR), with an awesome lord and a Runesmith with anti-magic runes, in a big unit of Ironbreakers (can last through a hell of a lot of shoting) or Hammerers [stubborn with LD 10 and rerolls on break tests=1-in-648 (if I did my math correctly) chance of failing a break test]. In that unit I have a standard bearer with RoGrungni (4+ ward save vs. missiles).

    I prefer Ironbreakers because of better armor save, same price (Vs. Hammerers w/ shields), Stubborn is almost usless as I doubt I'll lose CR, and great weapons aren't terribly useful when I have one rank'n'file troop on the front. But, if I win CR and the enemy doesn't break, Hammerers more than make up for their drawbacks.

    So, I like BSB's, but in a shooty or magicy army, I wouldn't take them, but then again I wouldn't play a shooty or magicy army.
    Last edited by Forthork; January 1st, 2007 at 22:58.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts