Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
As there is a new list in the WD i have a question, Does it matter or have influence for your army if your general has a mark or not for the purpose of army composition?
The list doesn't specify anything about this so i assume that there is no limit to it, rather like the daemon rules on marks.
Do you agree or am i missing something here.....
I hope the some of the more seasoned generals out there can shed some light on this matter.
i would useuallysay if it dousnt specify it dousnt matter so do as you wish .
They have (imho stupidly) removed all mark restrictions now (except from Beasts) so feel free to mix however you want to
Thanks for the answers, it's clear now.
I can give every one a different flavour now!!
dont go crazy you still need a coherent force.
Offcourse, I just don't have to take care about restrictions on marks like in Hordes of chaos.
even though this makes the list more flexible, it take the fluff away from the army list so they more geared towards the gaming than the models like they said they were. GW is just a conglomerate of hypocritical people.
"Bleh" is exactly how I would put it too. I was excited for the new rules until I read them.
David you're a genius!
Let's change the army subtitle to "Bleh!"
Anyway, the temporary list is quite annoying regarding the fluff aspect and the lack of magic.
It's better, it's shiny, it's warped...it's Chaos.