Welcome to Librarium Online!
Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!
Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!
i was wondering how everyone felt about a WoC army made entirely of warriors. no marauders (except for maybe a hunit of horsemen), just about 3 blocks of warriors, a unit of 2 or chosen and ,maybe some knights, a chariot and a warshrine and if im feeling saucy a hellcannon. so predominantly footslogging.
anyway, i was thinking of using dwarf tatics, as in slowly moving up the board softening things up with magic and the hellcannon.
anywho, i am not after an uber competitive army, mainly one thatll look freakin' badass on the board.
so yeh, what do you guys think?
(actually i think this belongs in the parent forum. sorry
Last edited by Stevethepirate; August 16th, 2009 at 10:23.
When in doubt, more Bloodcrushers
This army will end up being tiny. 10 warriors on their own cost 160 points.
You'll want the rapturous standard on one squad so its nearly impossible for them to break ( i love that standard. double 6 looks like "Holy crap! were loosing so badly! Its Awesome!").
Hellcannon's plus Wizards can go quite badly your way. Always take yourself an infernal puppet. Without it, you will be defenceless if you roll the misfire result that makes all wizards miscast.
If anyone believes on telekinesis, raise my hand!!