Please review: 2000 Warrior heavy - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Member durhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Age
    29
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    4 (x1)

    Please review: 2000 Warrior heavy

    After finally discovering the awesome potential of devourers, i thought i'd make a list to try to maximize them.... so for your review, i present:

    HQ:
    Broodlord + Retinue = 230
    -Extended Carapace
    -Flesh Hooks
    ---Retinue
    ----Flesh Hooks
    ----Extend Carapace

    Warriors x 5 = 190
    -Extend Carapace
    -Devourers
    -Scything Talons
    -Enhanced Senses
    -Toxin Sacks
    -Venom Cannon

    Elites:
    3 x Warriors x 5 = 570
    -Extend Carapace
    -Devourers
    -Scything Talons
    -Enhanced Senses
    -Toxin Sacks
    -Venom Cannon

    Troops:
    4 x Spinegaunts x 20 = 400

    Fast Attack:
    2 x Raveners x 3 =240
    -Scything talons
    -Rending claws

    Warriors x 6: = 246
    -Bio Plasma
    -Scything Talons
    -Rending claws
    -Wings

    Heavy Support:
    Carnifex = 124
    -TL Devourer
    -Barbed Strangler
    -Enhanced Senses
    I realize i could bring more devourer goodness going the godzilla route, but i feel like trying to not run fexes and tyrants for once, plus i want to feel the warrior love. The raveners are probably going to be used for anti tank and/or heavy weapon hunting, the broodlord for a huge target early game and possibly taking on nasty assault units (also could similarily be used like ravaners in a pinch.) The rest i find self explainitory. Enjoy the rest of your day here at universal studios theme park.


  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    searching for sheep silentdeathz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aberdeen, Scotland
    Age
    23
    Posts
    810
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputation
    36 (x2)

    Well... thats broodlord looks like a guy with a kick me sign on him to me...

    Anyway. not enough synapse(sp?)

    Teehee

    Devi only have 12" range, so i can see alot of warriors dying before they can do much, maybe some wings>

  4. #3
    Member durhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Age
    29
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    4 (x1)

    Devourer has 18" i thought...... but yeah.... I expect many of them to die and as such, put in the other targets which if not taken care of, could prove fatal, but you may be right. hmmmm....:hmm:

  5. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    167
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    9 (x1)

    I'd get Adrenal glands intstead of Bioplasma on those flying warriors.

    Only, i'm not sure a warrior-heavy army is a good idea. Warriors are synapse units, and this is the role they play in well-balanced army. Genestealers are better in CC, and fexes are beter for shooting. Gaunts are perfect for tying up enemy units while your fexes shoot and your Genestealers advance. You are loading up on warriors to the poi.nt that their role (providing synapse support) is no longer needed in your army

  6. #5
    Senior Member Luminaru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Virgina, USA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    574
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputation
    79 (x2)

    Have you read the so call "FAQ". Warriors got completly nerfed. You will have a super-hard time with lascannon armies...

    -Doom

  7. #6
    Member durhead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Age
    29
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    4 (x1)

    I realize that that was when it first came out, but they quickly redid the faq to where it now states quite the opposite:
    http://uk.games-workshop.com/news/er...yranidsFAQ.pdf

    In response to fireman: I realize such and that this list may be a bad idea from its incarnation, but i'd figure i'd at least proxy it to change up the flow a little bit from the more standard list types

  8. #7
    LO Zealot
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,568
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    280 (x6)

    Looks like a fun list to play, but not that competitive. Not enough AV, imo. And if I were you, I'd give the warriors TL-Dev's instead of Dev+ST... with BS3, you're going to want to reroll those misses.

    And as Innuit said, those flying warriors definitely need AG-I.

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    267
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    7 (x1)

    Actually, as a marine player with some bug hunting xp, I think the list looks a bit scary. Thats a pretty solid number of spinegaunts to take hits, or even to lay down enough firepower to inflict good casualties if they get ignored and can close. Plus, the large number of Warriors with Raveners also provide so many targets that need to be addressed I'm somewhat at a loss as to what to shoot first. Thats never a good sign so I think the list would work well based just on that.

  10. #9
    searching for sheep silentdeathz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Aberdeen, Scotland
    Age
    23
    Posts
    810
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputation
    36 (x2)

    Quote Originally Posted by durhead
    I realize that that was when it first came out, but they quickly redid the faq to where it now states quite the opposite:
    http://uk.games-workshop.com/news/er...yranidsFAQ.pdf

    In response to fireman: I realize such and that this list may be a bad idea from its incarnation, but i'd figure i'd at least proxy it to change up the flow a little bit from the more standard list types
    Ye 18" sorry, was thinking bout eldar (had a battle with them in like 20 min)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts