Now we have the Doomweaver rules.... - Warhammer 40K Fantasy
 

Welcome to Librarium Online!

Join our community of 80,000+ members and take part in the number one resource for Warhammer and Warhammer 40K discussion!

Registering gives you full access to take part in discussions, upload pictures, contact other members and search everything!


Register Now!

User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member TalismanOfVaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Birmingham United Kingdom
    Age
    43
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    20 (x1)

    Now we have the Doomweaver rules....

    I wonder if they will make a similar rule for the Shadow Weaver Support Platforms? Possibly when you field 3 Weaver platforms as a single unit. Obviously not twin linked but 3 combined shots make 1 large blast.

    Last edited by TalismanOfVaul; June 27th, 2010 at 01:12.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    Librarium-Online.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Senior Member MrBenis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Auckland, NZ.
    Age
    28
    Posts
    551
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    6 (x2)

    Alternatively just provide shadow-weavers with that nifty new special rule. Seems more important.
    My compiled thoughts blog.
    If someone posts something helpful +rep them

  4. #3
    Senior Member Archon Charybdis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    108 (x3)

    Yeah, I'd be fine with a small blast with Rending and the difficult and dangerous terrain.

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Reputation
    25 (x1)

    Doubt we'll see anything for the support platforms. If they'd wanted to change those as well then putting the rules in the same white dwarf would have been the sensible thing, especially since they were releasing new models for the platforms at the same time.

  6. #5
    Senior Member Archon Charybdis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    579
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    108 (x3)

    Not at the moment we won't, but in a couple years when the next codex comes out.

  7. #6
    LO Zealot cKerensky's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Age
    31
    Posts
    1,677
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    146 (x5)

    I was secretly hoping that the support weapons would go away, but they released the shiny new models.

    I still won't run them, but maybe next codex they'll be a troops choice as opposed to heavy support. As long as they're heavy support, I'll never run them. As troops? Now we're talkin.

  8. #7
    Senior Member niraco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,273
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    ReputationReputationReputationReputationReputationReputation
    168 (x4)

    Quote Originally Posted by cKerensky View Post
    I was secretly hoping that the support weapons would go away, but they released the shiny new models.

    I still won't run them, but maybe next codex they'll be a troops choice as opposed to heavy support. As long as they're heavy support, I'll never run them. As troops? Now we're talkin.
    amen
    Hight elf and Craftworld Eldar army project pics heavy: linky

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts