Thank you for visiting Librarium Online Blogs! We are happy to have you. Make sure to checkout our forum and discuss Warhammer with over 80,000 other members!


Visit the Forums Now!

|

Army Lists: Two Eldar Lists – 2,000 points

I have been pondering about the below two Eldar lists. Will be a long project for me as got my wedding coming up in September. Be nice to play the Eldar again 🙂 Eldar ‘List 1’ – 2,000 points HQ Autarch – eldar jetbike, fusion gun, mantle of the laughing god & firesabre Elite 5 x Fire Dragons w/ Wave Serpent – twin-linked scatter lasers & holofield 5 x Fire Dragons w/ Wave Serpent – twin-linked scatter lasers & holofield Troops 10 x Dire Avengers w/ Wave Serpent – twin-linked brightlance & holofield 10 x Dire Avengers w/ Wave Serpent – twin-linked brightlance & holofield 10 x Dire Avengers w/ Wave Serpent – twin-linked brightlance & holofield 10 x Guardians Fast Attack 5 x Warp Spiders 5 x Warp Spiders Heavy Support Fire Prism – holofield Fire Prism – holofield Total: 2,010 This is my first drafted list based off my original list. From the original I dropped a unit of Fire Dragons as I do not feel they are need any more. I have added Warp Spiders and a unit of Guardians. I was hoping to get an ADL with quad gun in, but no luck 🙁 Tactics are all theory, but basically zoom up moving flat out to get 3+ cover save thanks to holofields. If night fighting is in play will be 2+ cover save is distance is right. Warp Spiders jump up too. On turn 2 rock up, bail out, unleash brightlances and fusion to slag vehicles, shuri to maul infantry and Fire Prisms to blast infantry to kingdom come or crack open tough vehicles. While all the above is happening the Autarch zooms about slagging transport vehicles and then assaulting what is inside or tackles weak troops or camping units etc

Go here to see the original:
Army Lists: Two Eldar Lists – 2,000 points

Posted by on June 8 2013. Filed under Blog Network. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

Leave a Reply