Black Katalyst said:
You are slightly off on your calculations for toxin sacs. It should look like this with the corrections underlined.
]16x Hormagaunts Charging (Toxin Sacs)
Versus WS3 T3
48 attacks
32 hits
21 wounds
Versus WS3 T4
48 attacks
32 hits
16 wounds
Versus WS4 T3
48 attacks
24 hits
16 wounds
Versus WS4 T4
48 attacks
24 hits
12 wounds
Black Katalyst said:
You are slightly off of you calculations for this as well due to the same error as the toxin sacs. It should look like this with the corrections underlined.
16x Hormagaunts Charging (WS Adrenal Gland and Toxin Sacs)
Versus WS3 T3
48 attacks
32 hits
21 wounds
Versus WS3 T4
48 attacks
32 hits
16 wounds
Versus WS4 T3
48 attacks
32 hits
21 wounds
Versus WS4 T4
48 attacks
32 hits
16 wounds
The correction would make this part of your calculations look like this. Again, with corrections underlined.Black Katalyst said:
16x Hormagaunts Charging (no Biomorphs) = 46 wounds
16x Hormagaunts Charging (WS Adrenal Gland) = 52 wounds
16x Hormagaunts Charging (Toxin Sacs) = 65 wounds
16x Hormagaunts Charging (WS Adrenal Glands and Toxin Sacs) = 74 wounds
So…
16x Hormagaunts (no Biomorphs) = 160 points
16x Hormagaunts (WS Adrenal Gland) = 176 points
16x Hormagaunts Charging (Toxin Sacs) = 192 points
16x Hormagaunts Charging (WS Adrenal Glands and Toxin Sacs) = 208 points
Which means…
-With WS Adrenal Glands, you receive 6 more wounds at 2.7 points per wound.
-With Toxin Sacs, you receive 28 more wounds at 1.68 points per wound.
-With Toxin Sacs and WS Adrenal Glands, you receive 34 more wounds at 1.71 per wound.
In the end this does not change conclusion, just though I would point it out as it slightly blunt the effectiveness of the toxin sacs. Overall very nice job, it really helps to put the bimorph cost compared to effectiveness into perspective. In the future you could try to include a way to factor in the units size as that effects it survivability and should also be a concern (21 basic hormogaunts will last longer than 16 WS adrenal glands and toxin sacs ones).
Again good analysis though :yes: